Implicating reverse_cowgirl_position → from_behind
Link to implication

Reason:

Definition of reverse_cowgirl_position.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but im pretty certain cowgirl and reverse cowgirl are positions where the receiver is riding on top of the giver. I don't think that underneath and behind are the same thing in most situations.

Not as proposed. But it would work for implicating chair_position to --> from_behind, which I suspect is the position Qmannn probably had in mind.

The reverse_cowgirl_position tag is actually a mess between chair_position (where the person penetrating is sitting and the penetratee is sitting on their lap, both are facing the same direction as if sitting in a chair, having sex) and actual reverse_cowgirl_position (where the person penetrating is laying down with the penetratee sitting on top, usually with the laying-down-partner's penis or strapon inside of the person who's on top, having sex).

Because chair_position IS a from_behind type of sex position, it makes sense to implicate these two. But because reverse_cowgirl_position is more of a "from underneath" type of position, (and it's already implicated with on_top for that reason), then implicating it to --> from_behind would create a bad tag mess.

(As information background: It's part of a pretty big tag mess because cowgirl_position, reverse_cowgirl_position and missionary_position were created ages ago, and for awhile they were some of the only sex-position type tags available. So for years people used them for both those positions and also anything even slightly close to those positions because there just weren't other tags for the other sex positions. Other tags like chair_position (the sitting version of reverse_cowgirl_position), mastery_position (the sitting version of cowgirl_position), table_lotus_position (sort of like missionary_position, but the one penetrating is standing while the partner is laying on their back on a raised surface like a bed, table, bench...) etc were added a lot more recently in order to tag those positions more accurately, so things have been slowly getting retagged over the last year or so as people find, fix and update things. But the backlog includes a lot of images, so a lot is still mistagged. It just hasn't all been cleaned up yet.

ETA: Tokaido would be correct.

As usual, I agree with everything that furrypickle said.
This implication should be denied, but we could implicate chair_position to from_behind.

Alright, reverse_cowgirl_position to --> from_behind is deleted for the reasons stated in the discussion.
Approving an implication for chair_position to --> from_behind instead. (Which might be what was meant to be suggesting in the first place, we don't know.)

furrypickle said:
Alright, reverse_cowgirl_position to --> from_behind is deleted for the reasons stated in the discussion.
Approving an implication for chair_position to --> from_behind instead. (Which might be what was meant to be suggesting in the first place, we don't know.)

I think I speak for everyone when I say that we really appreciate these concise tag resolutions. I wish there was a better way to say that other than just "thanks" :P

Tokaido said:
I think I speak for everyone when I say that we really appreciate these concise tag resolutions. I wish there was a better way to say that other than just "thanks" :P

Nevertheless, it really means a lot to hear it's appreciated. It does take more time to do it this way. But it's the user feedback like this which lets me know that it's worth doing it this way and that it matters. So thanks for saying something about it anyways. =)