The bulk update request #1461 is active.

create implication star_bellied_sneetch (0) -> sneetch (1)
create implication sneetch (1) -> dr._seuss (349)

Reason: Just one post in them, but regardless, these tags are misspelled. If it's deemed better to alias instead for discoverability purposes that works too

EDIT: The bulk update request #1461 (forum #318728) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

If it's just one, it can be more easily changed by hand. But is sneech or sneetch the correct spelling?

watsit said:
If it's just one, it can be more easily changed by hand. But is sneech or sneetch the correct spelling?

It's consistently the official spelling. It's Sneetch on the cover of the book back to the original 1961 publishing, and it's Sneetch in the body text as well.

I fixed the spelling by hand since it was just one post. However, you could change this BUR to have

imply star_bellied_sneetch -> sneetch
imply sneetch -> dr._suess

so if any future post has sneetches, it'll auto-apply relevant tags.

watsit said:
I fixed the spelling by hand since it was just one post. However, you could change this BUR to have

imply star_bellied_sneetch -> sneetch
imply sneetch -> dr._suess

so if any future post has sneetches, it'll auto-apply relevant tags.

makes sense to me, i didn't even realise those relationships didn't exist yet but i guess that follows from the tag being almost unused by anyone. done