The bulk update request #1367 is active.

create implication swatch_(deltarune) (134) -> deltarune (17339)
create implication tasque (147) -> deltarune (17339)
change category tasque (147) -> species
create implication tasque_manager (1731) -> deltarune (17339)
create implication queen_(deltarune) (139) -> deltarune (17339)
create implication sweet_(deltarune) (43) -> deltarune (17339)
create implication cake_(deltarune) (0) -> deltarune (17339)
mass update k_k -> cake_(deltarune)
create implication cap'n_(deltarune) (39) -> deltarune (17339)
mass update cap'n -> cap'n_(deltarune)
change category rudinn (21) -> species
create implication virovirokun (130) -> deltarune (17339)
create implication spamton_neo (18) -> deltarune (17339)
create implication werewire (129) -> deltarune (17339)
create alias q5u4ex7yy2e9n (0) -> queen_(deltarune) (139)

Reason: More deltarune characters.

• "K_K is short for Cakes", probably left that way so fans could google deltarune kk and not get stuck finding top and spin cakes.
• That seemingly random string is the Queen's serial number.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1367 (forum #317264) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

post #2950660
Official art from Nelnal suggests it's just cake without an S, so I'll update that bit.

The bulk update request #1379 is active.

create implication swatchling (396) -> deltarune (17339)
create alias rudinn_(deltarune) (0) -> rudinn (21)
create implication rudinn (21) -> deltarune (17339)
create alias nubert_(deltarune) (0) -> nubert (33)
create implication nubert (33) -> deltarune (17339)
create alias spamton (0) -> spamton_g._spamton (187)
create alias spamton_g_spamton (0) -> spamton_g._spamton (187)
create implication spamton_g._spamton (187) -> deltarune (17339)

Reason: Split off because I know some of y'all don't like the idea of these aliases.

• Nubert and Rudinn have unnecessary suffixes.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1379 (forum #317433) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias swatchling_(deltarune) -> swatchling)

EDIT: The bulk update request #1379 (forum #317433) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #1367 (forum #317264) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #1379 (forum #317433) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias swatchling_(deltarune) -> swatchling)

The bulk update request #1379 (forum #317433) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

auto_moderator said:
The bulk update request #1379 (forum #317433) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias swatchling_(deltarune) -> swatchling)

Problem seems to be located in topic #30822.

The bulk update request #1550 is active.

create alias serial_number_q5u4ex7yy2e9n_(deltarune) (0) -> queen_(deltarune) (139)
create alias serial_number_q5u4ex7yy2e9n (0) -> queen_(deltarune) (139)

Reason: ????? People really want to call Queen by her serial number, huh?

EDIT: The bulk update request #1550 (forum #320091) has been approved by @slyroon.

sieghelm_lockayer said:
The bulk update request #1550 is active.

create alias serial_number_q5u4ex7yy2e9n_(deltarune) (0) -> queen_(deltarune) (139)
create alias serial_number_q5u4ex7yy2e9n (0) -> queen_(deltarune) (139)

Reason: ????? People really want to call Queen by her serial number, huh?

All 38 of those were done by a single user.

furrin_gok said:
All 38 of those were done by a single user.

WTH... They are even replacing the queen_(deltarune) tag to her serial number. I still find this to be a valid BUR tho, if an admin deems unnecessary and reject it so be it. ; - ;

The bulk update request #1550 (forum #320091) has been approved by @slyroon.