Topic: [APPROVED] Mythological Fox BUR

The bulk update request #1267 is active.

remove implication huli_jing (9) -> fox_spirit (3685)
remove implication kumiho (338) -> fox_spirit (3685)
remove implication nogitsune (32) -> fox_spirit (3685)
create implication huli_jing (9) -> mythological_fox (516)
create implication kumiho (338) -> mythological_fox (516)
create implication nogitsune (32) -> mythological_fox (516)
remove implication fox_spirit (3685) -> canine (1494363)
remove implication fox_spirit (3685) -> east_asian_mythology (27229)
create implication mythological_fox (516) -> mythological_canine (68800)
create implication mythological_canine (68800) -> canine (1494363)
remove alias mythological_creature (737814) -> mythology (775725)

Reason: During an extremely long discussion in the Discord server, a few people brought up concerns that fox_spirit may be inadequate for its implications due to frequent mistagging. By recreating the implication chain in mythological_fox, the issue of cleanup is simplified.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1267 (forum #315880) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

I don't see a reason we should remove that alias from mythology. The rest of the BUR looks fine.

thevileone said:
I don't see a reason we should remove that alias from mythology. The rest of the BUR looks fine.

The reasoning in the Discord discussion after you went to bed was that mythological_canine and other mythological_* tags could imply mythological_creature and the latter could imply mythology. That would reduce the amount of implications to mythology, keeping things neater and easier to track.

thevileone said:
I don't see a reason we should remove that alias from mythology. The rest of the BUR looks fine.

I think it should be an implication rather than an alias, but the alias has to be removed first to make it an implication.

The bulk update request #1267 (forum #315880) has been approved by @bitWolfy.