Topic: Does doggystyle apply if not all arms are on the ground?

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

faucet said:
I think being on all fours should be a requirement of the doggystyle position, otherwise half the stuff under the other position tags like jockey_position and leapfrog_position start to have tons of overlap.

I personally view doggystyle as more of a loose catch-all outside the *_position tagging, referring to too many distinct pose sets and too close to useful for invalidation. I would consider most of these to be doggystyle.

strikerman said:
All of these are tagged with doggystyle, and by extension all_fours since one tag implies the other. They fit most people's expectation of a doggystyle, except that not all four of the bottom's arms are planted on the ground. Is it acceptable for these posts to be tagged with doggystyle, or should some other tag be used?

I'd say the ones where the penetratee has only one hand on the floor should still count as doggystyle. I take the all_fours tag to refer to the body position of having your knees and hands on the ground, like a human imitating a dog, but not necessarily literally all four touching the ground at the same time - you can refer to someone as "walking around on all fours", but you obviously can't walk if all four limbs are stuck to the ground.

The middle one is definitely not doggystyle though, like Watsit said, as their chest is touching the ground.

  • 1