The tag implication #40223 neckerchief -> clothing has been rejected.

Reason: A neckerchief is an article of clothing worn around the neck.

EDIT: The tag implication neckerchief -> clothing (forum #312110) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

necktie and bowtie and such aren't considered clothing, so I don't think neckerchief should be either. That would mean someone wearing just a neckerchief technically wouldn't be nude, and sex would classify as clothed_sex.

watsit said:
necktie and bowtie and such aren't considered clothing, so I don't think neckerchief should be either. That would mean someone wearing just a neckerchief technically wouldn't be nude, and sex would classify as clothed_sex.

not just a neckerchief she also has goggles

Very incidental to the thread, but is there a certain point where a character can wear enough accessories to go from nude to mostly nude?

strikerman said:

Very incidental to the thread, but is there a certain point where a character can wear enough accessories to go from nude to mostly nude?

I would say if there is any article of clothing left on the character, it would be considered mostly_nude.
The only exceptions I feel would be accessories (e.g., eyewear/glasses_only) and jewelry (crowns, necklaces, armlets, etc.), those can be tagged with nude.

I'm in favor of making neckerchief a clothing tag (along with bandanna, and other kerchief and neckwear tags).

However, it might be better to make neckwear a tag for various clothing items that are worn around the neck (such as scarf, and possibly neckerchief), and neckgear for non-clothing items that are worn around the neck (such as necktie or bow_tie).

watsit said:
necktie and bowtie and such aren't considered clothing, so I don't think neckerchief should be either. That would mean someone wearing just a neckerchief technically wouldn't be nude, and sex would classify as clothed_sex.

This makes me wonder how mostly_nude factors into clothed_sex (since the wiki for clothed_sex doesn't mention it). Would clothed_sex apply to mostly_nude characters, since they are wearing clothing (despite being a minimal amount of clothing)? If not, should some other tag be made for when a mostly_nude character has sex (something like mostly_nude_sex)?

would it make sense for nude to apply to characters whose genitals aren't covered by clothing, whereas mostly nude would be for clothing or accessories that don't cover genitals but cover nonetheless?

garfieldfromgarfield said:
would it make sense for nude to apply to characters whose genitals aren't covered by clothing, whereas mostly nude would be for clothing or accessories that don't cover genitals but cover nonetheless?

The nude tag is used when a character "isn't wearing any clothing at all". If a character is wearing any amount of clothing, the nude tag would not apply to that character (however, a nude character can wear accessory items and still be considered nude).

The bottomless tag would probably fit those instances better. This tag is used when a character wears "clothing over the upper half of their body, but not over the lower half" (similar to how topless is used for a character "wearing clothing over the lower half of their body, but not the upper half").

The tag implication neckerchief -> clothing (forum #312110) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.