Aliasing flabebe → flabébé
Link to alias

Reason:

It's not used yet, but it will probably get mistagged at some point in the future.

Makes sense. (Just like when we aliased pokemon to --> pokémon and for the same reasons). Approved.

I also added an implication for flabébé to --> pokémon because it wasn't yet. Done.

furrypickle said:
Makes sense. (Just like when we aliased pokemon to --> pokémon and for the same reasons). Approved.

I also added an implication for flabébé to --> pokémon because it wasn't yet. Done.

There's a ton of those missing actually. I'm not sure how best to remedy that without dumping it all into the forums (300-400 implications at least).

parasprite said:
There's a ton of those missing actually. I'm not sure how best to remedy that without dumping it all into the forums (300-400 implications at least).

Wow, that is a lot. Well, because whether-or-not-something-is-in-fact-a-pokemon is entirely objective, verifiable through google and not really a discussion point...go ahead and compile a list of all the ones that still need implicated to pokémon and Dmail it to me. If there are any that seem ambiguous or like they'd benefit from an actual discussion, then do those the normal way with a forum thread. (probably not needed, but in case you run into any that do). But that way we don't have to flood the forums with all the ones that just need implicated to pokémon for searches and tagging and blacklists. But it will still get done. It will be a win-win.

furrypickle said:
Wow, that is a lot. Well, because whether-or-not-something-is-in-fact-a-pokemon is entirely objective, verifiable through google and not really a discussion point...go ahead and compile a list of all the ones that still need implicated to pokémon and Dmail it to me. If there are any that seem ambiguous or like they'd benefit from an actual discussion, then do those the normal way with a forum thread. (probably not needed, but in case you run into any that do). But that way we don't have to flood the forums with all the ones that just need implicated to pokémon for searches and tagging and blacklists. But it will still get done. It will be a win-win.

I'll compile it later tonight into a pastebin or something similar. There's also a bunch that should probably be implicated to mega_evolution and legendary_pokémon (if those categories actually matter).

I would say mega_evolution is an important one, but it's basically must mega_* pokemon that would imply mega_evolution.

Should legendary_pokémon be really a valid tag? I mean who really search for this tag or blacklist it? Pokemons tagged with this are completely different without any common theme. Imo this tag makes as much sense as pokemon_with_national_dex_no_divisible_by_5

Granberia said:
Should legendary_pokémon be really a valid tag? I mean who really search for this tag or blacklist it? Pokemons tagged with this are completely different without any common theme. Imo this tag makes as much sense as pokemon_with_national_dex_no_divisible_by_5

I'm almost disappointed that that isn't a real tag.

Only arceus is implicated to legendary_pokémon right now anyways. I'd be happy just to alias it to pokémon and leave the wiki page as a hub for pokénerds (because...well it's already there).