Topic: pubes wiki vs crotch_tuft wiki

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

"Not to be confused with crotch_tuft which is for fur of similar color/texture to that of the rest of the fur on the character's body. For search and/or blacklist purposes, pubes and crotch_tuft can be tagged together."

"Not to be confused with pubes, which describes hair in contrasting color or nature to that of a character's natural fur."

So... should they be tagged together or not? That line in pubes is really confusing me.

I've assumed pubes and crotch_tuft were each tagged separately, though I could be wrong.

The line quoted from the pubes wiki could have been referring to posts that include both a character with pubes and another character with crotch_tuft, but the wording of the sentence leaves it's intended meaning confusing. I can edit the wiki to amend this, though I'd like to get some opinions from folks to be sure that I'm not mistaken on this subject.

d.d.m. said:
The line quoted from the pubes wiki could have been referring to posts that include both a character with pubes and another character with crotch_tuft, but the wording of the sentence leaves it's intended meaning confusing. I can edit the wiki to amend this, though I'd like to get some opinions from folks to be sure that I'm not mistaken on this subject.

Yeah I assumed that too considering the wording in both says they should be separate, I just didn't want to edit it blindly either.

  • 1