Topic: [APPROVED] BUR only ('*_only' tag stuff)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Monsterbomb10010

Member

The bulk update request #116 is active.

remove implication hat_only (9093) -> mostly_nude (123875)
remove implication hat_only (9093) -> headwear (221700)
create implication hat_only (9093) -> hat (204079)
create implication hat_only (9093) -> headwear_only (10374)
create implication headwear_only (10374) -> headwear (221700)
create implication headwear_only (10374) -> mostly_nude (123875)
create implication headwear_only (10374) -> headgear_only (11790)
create implication headgear_only (11790) -> headgear (290355)
create implication helmet_only (984) -> helmet (29973)
create implication helmet_only (984) -> headgear_only (11790)
create implication mask_only (928) -> mask (48344)
create implication mask_only (928) -> nude (1246834)
create implication sunglasses_only (1228) -> sunglasses (33037)
create implication sunglasses_only (1228) -> eyewear_only (9829)
create implication glasses_only (7553) -> glasses (213886)
create implication eyewear_only (9829) -> nude (1246834)
create implication boots_only (1935) -> boots (75648)
create implication boots_only (1935) -> footwear_only (8638)
create implication sandals_only (254) -> sandals (14382)
create implication sandals_only (254) -> footwear_only (8638)
create implication socks_only (2099) -> socks (64186)
create implication socks_only (2099) -> mostly_nude (123875)
create implication underwear_only (20494) -> underwear (361274)
create implication underwear_only (20494) -> clothed (1142761)
create implication panties_only (2935) -> underwear_only (20494)
create implication panties_only (2935) -> topless (130454)
create implication bra_only (341) -> bra (68533)
create implication bra_only (341) -> underwear_only (20494)
create implication bra_only (341) -> bottomless (155056)
create implication topwear_only (10050) -> topwear (537144)
create implication topwear_only (10050) -> bottomless (155056)
create implication coat_only (203) -> coat (20946)
create implication coat_only (203) -> topwear_only (10050)
create implication shirt_only (4061) -> shirt (323805)
create implication shirt_only (4061) -> topwear_only (10050)
create implication hoodie_only (2116) -> hoodie (50600)
create implication hoodie_only (2116) -> topwear_only (10050)
create implication robe_only (700) -> robe (18888)
create implication robe_only (700) -> mostly_nude (123875)
create implication scarf_only (2630) -> mostly_nude (123875)
create implication gloves_only (3087) -> gloves (191756)
create implication gloves_only (3087) -> handwear_only (3350)
create implication handwear_only (3350) -> handwear (200907)
create implication handwear_only (3350) -> mostly_nude (123875)

Reason: When a user gives some *_only tags attention, and nothing else...

Also see implication #29810 (panties_only -> panties)

EDIT: The bulk update request #116 (forum #293104) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Watsit

Privileged

Shouldn't those aliases be implications? Also hat_only -> hat and helmet_only -> helmet implications would make sense too.

user 187249

Member

+1, and nothing else...

Actually, there is something else. I noticed a few implications missing from the list.

Extra Implications

create implication glasses_only -> glasses
create implication handwear_only -> handwear
create implication panties_only -> panties

I'm also unsure about the eyewear_only/mask_only -> nude implications. I guess it depends whether or not a 'non-clothing_only' tag (collar_only, eyewear_only) and a 'clothing_only' tag (headwear_only, footwear_only) can be used on the same post.

Genjar

Former Staff

strikerman said:
Not mostly nude?

Wondered about that myself. Accessories don't count as clothing, so if masks are accessories then it's nude. But perhaps those should be considered clothing.

  • 1