The bulk update request #67 is active.

create implication bucentaur (59) -> humanoid_taur (5561)
create implication centaur (4168) -> humanoid_taur (5561)

Reason: A missing implication, as humanoid_taur is already implicated to taur, and other *_taur tags are implicated to taur and their respective species tag.

I think centaur should also be implicated to humanoid_taur since the centaur wiki description seems to indirectly describe them as a equid_taur/humanoid_taur. Similarly, bucentaur seems like it should be implicated to humanoid_taur, but requires some cleanup first due to some non-humanoid bovine_taur mistags.

Tag Implications:

• bucentaur -> humanoid_taur
• centaur -> humanoid_taur
• humanoid_taur -> humanoid

Remove Implications:

• human_taur -> human

Edit:

• Removed the humanoid_taur -> humanoid implication request, and added the human_taur -> human deimplication request.

Edit 2:

• Removed the de-implication human_taur -> human, since it got approved separately.

EDIT: The bulk update request #67 (forum #291431) has been approved by @Millcore.

Humanoid is a separate body type from taur, hence tags such as humanoid_on_taur. Those should never be tagged for the same character, unless it's something like a transformation scene.

(See also: forum #279702)

I can see how that would be sensible. But how would human_taur fit in with that, since it currently has an implication to human. To me, it seems like human_taur and humanoid_taur should be consistent with the other, where both tags are either implicated to their prefix or where both are not.

Also, does the centaur/bucentaur implication to humanoid_taur seem alright?

The human_taur -> human implication must've been an oversight, most of the taur implications were made in one huge chunk. Considering that even simple changes such as pointy ears or animal genitalia is enough to disqualify the human tag, the human_taurs definitely don't belong in there.

Those look more like content that belongs in chimera, though that's generally for mixed species. Not for added limbs of same species.

I can update the bulk update request to reflect that (if editing a bulk update request is possible). Though I'm wondering if the centaur/bucentaur implications to humanoid_taur seem fine? (and sorry if I'm being buggy/annoying about this, I'm just wanting to be sure about those implications before updating the request)

d.d.m. said:
Though I'm wondering if the centaur/bucentaur implications to humanoid_taur seem fine? (and sorry if I'm being buggy/annoying about this, I'm just wanting to be sure about those implications before updating the request)

I suppose those are fine. Centaur gets tagged for other things occasionally. Some users confuse it with taur which will cause some mistags after the implication, but it's probably not common enough to worry about.

Alright, bulk update request edited to reflect all of this.

I'll remove the de-implication human_taur -> human from the above BUR since this de-implication got approved in topic #27294.

The bulk update request #67 (forum #291431) has been approved by @Millcore.