Can somebody change my "anatomically_incorrect_penis" tag into "incorrect_penis" or "wrong_penis" for me?

nine_tailed_fury said:
Can somebody change my "anatomically_incorrect_penis" tag into "incorrect_penis" or "wrong_penis" for me?

Those aren't used either. The type of genitalia is usually tagged but I don't think anyone's tagged whether the genitalia matches the character or not.

agentparadox said:
Those aren't used either. The type of genitalia is usually tagged but I don't think anyone's tagged whether the genitalia matches the character or not.

Last I checked any form of pointing out that the genitals are anatomically incorrect was not to be used due to artists submitting takedowns over it.

furrin_gok said:
Last I checked any form of pointing out that the genitals are anatomically incorrect was not to be used due to artists submitting takedowns over it.

R.i.p. thinskins.

violet_rose said:
Could we come up with a tag that doesn't come across as judgemental to solve both problems?
...
These feel clunky to me, any better ideas?

Non-standard_genitals? Essentially non-human genitals that don't match the species of the bearer.

Then again, this might be something that might be too subjective to tag meaningfully. Anthros don't exist, after all, so who can say what would be correct or incorrect genitals with them?

Our dragon (breasts) are different sort of situation? Note: Flat chests are still breasts, in sense of chickens (feral or anthro) and (anatomic) men still having them.

And LOL@takedowns over tagging. Didn't we have similar issues with TWYS and artists basing tags on off-site/different-image-on-site references?

Well, these tags were to help people find art made by people that love dragons, other reptiles, and birds with external balls, and some other art made by people who decide that all animals only have horse and dog penises . (I feel like making a "snowflake" joke.)

clawstripe said:
Non-standard_genitals? Essentially non-human genitals that don't match the species of the bearer.

Then again, this might be something that might be too subjective to tag meaningfully. Anthros don't exist, after all, so who can say what would be correct or incorrect genitals with them?

This is a good point. For fictional species like dragons, standard/correct only exists by way of convention. atypical_genitalia might work better, avoiding most connotations of 'correctness' without being too wordy.

Another concern is the overwhelming majority of anthropomorphic art that features humanoid vulva and/or humanoid penises. Such a tag would technically apply to all of those, and so lower the signal-to-noise ratio to practically nothing.

With the new site backend, searches can include up to 40 tags, which gives a lot more options for tailoring toward one's preferred combination of species and bits.