Implicating backsack → balls
Link to implication

Reason:

You can't have 'backsack' without it

Yeah

...Why the hell is there a tag for this? It should be as simple as searching "balls from_behind".

123easy said:
...Why the hell is there a tag for this? It should be as simple as searching "balls from_behind".

from_behind is a sex position, not a direction, and it shouldn't be used that way. =(

You could try balls back_turned maybe, but even then I doubt it would work as well. ETA: that actually works amazingly well. So maybe we don't need it. It's a thought.

123easy said:
...Why the hell is there a tag for this? It should be as simple as searching "balls from_behind".

From that search, it doesn't give the user what they are looking for
post #519646 post #519563 post #516259 post #515651
None of those show the backsack

Sounds like a pretty useless tag. Seems balls + taint covers all posts.

Why make it complicated if we can just use one word to cover every post in its criteria?

TheHuskyK9 said:
Why make it complicated if we can just use one word to cover every post in its criteria?

FWIW, I'm fine with keeping backsack as a tag. It's nice to have some tags directly for things, especially since members can only search 6 tags at a time. If everything is ___ + ___ then they can't search for much. If search terms were unlimited that would be a different story.

If we do keep backsack though then I'm going to add it to my tagging list to go through back_turned balls -backsack and add backsack to the ones that fit. Because it seemed like there were few that could use the tag.

furrypickle said:
FWIW, I'm fine with keeping backsack as a tag. It's nice to have some tags directly for things, especially since members can only search 6 tags at a time. If everything is ___ + ___ then they can't search for much. If search terms were unlimited that would be a different story.

I guess that makes sense. You get me on yer side.

I recently noticed backsack being used more frequently and wondered if it was a legit tag, I guess so.
I'm for backsack.

Yeah, I've been using it a lot today for some reason. I actually think 'backsack' isn't the most intuitive way to describe the content (I mean, try to come up with that word if you're new), but it does sound nice.

Backsack. Rolls right off the tongue.

TheHuskyK9 said:
Why make it complicated if we can just use one word to cover every post in its criteria?

There's no point in tagging things that aren't useful for searches, and I dunno why anyone would ever search for backsack.

But if there are users who actually need it for something... then yeah, sure, it should be kept.

Genjar said:
...I dunno why anyone would ever search for backsack.

But if there are users who actually need it for something... then yeah, sure, it should be kept.

I'm pretty sure it's a kink for some people, much like underboob is. Both are mild kinks for me, so I can kind of see the appeal in it. I imagine that some people get into it a lot more than me though. So I do think the tag is probably getting used by people looking for this.

furrypickle said:
from_behind is a sex position, not a direction, and it shouldn't be used that way. =(

You could try balls back_turned maybe, but even then I doubt it would work as well. ETA: that actually works amazingly well. So maybe we don't need it. It's a thought.

That's actually what I was thinking. Got the two tags mixed up in my head.