Should pregnancy tags be updated to include the affected character gender? Is there a reason male_pregnancy is the only gender-specific version we tag? There's currently ~8564 posts tagged as pregnant and ~514 tagged as male_pregnancy
I'm not covering every tag such as hyper_pregnancy or breast_pregnancy as I feel the outliers are semi-well defined but may need implications. Here's my suggestion to reorganize and update the hierarchy focusing mainly on gender tags.

• Create a pregnant_* tag for every gender
• Implicate pregnant_female, pregnant_male, pregnant_ambiguous, pregnant_intersex to pregnant
• Implicate pregnant_herm, pregnant_maleherm, pregnant_dickgirl, pregnant_cuntboy to pregnant_intersex
• Alias male_pregnancy to pregnant_male
• mpreg will need to be unaliased from male_pregnancy and to pregnant_male

• Related: Do you think pregnant_cub is a valid and useful tag? It seems it's been mostly seeded by one user but has other users tagging it as well. Can be used in combination with any pregnant_* to find pregnant young furry characters of desired gender, but what about pregnant non-furries? pregnant_young sounds awkward to me.

Here's what the tag flow will look like for gender only. I may make an additional post in this thread talking about all *_pregnancy and pregnant_* tags, but the focus is gender since most of those are outliers as I already said.

• pregnant
• pregnant_female
• pregnant_male
• pregnant_ambiguous
• pregnant_intersex
• pregnant_herm
• pregnant_maleherm
• pregnant_dickgirl
• pregnant_cuntboy

Sounds good to me. +1

Honestly I don't mind mpreg applying to men with vaginas (easily hidden/found by people with an added tag in search), but I suppose for the other gender tags it could be useful

At least 85% of the tag are pregnant females, so I don't know how I feel about tagging those. Would be simpler to just tag the exceptions, then search for pregnant -pregnant_male -pregnant_intersex.

Genjar said:
At least 85% of the tag are pregnant females, so I don't know how I feel about tagging those. Would be simpler to just tag the exceptions, then search for pregnant -pregnant_male -pregnant_intersex.

I'd rather not leave an exception, that'd make it harder to find posts that simply weren't tagged.

Furrin_Gok said:
I'd rather not leave an exception, that'd make it harder to find posts that simply weren't tagged.

True, but only if they get tagged to the level where it matters.

The pregnant tag has over 8500+ posts, that's a lot to check one-by-one. Tagging projects such as that rarely get far, I'd rather not see an another tag that's only tagged for 10% of posts that should have it.

At the very least, I'd suggest focusing on the non-female pregnancy tags first. If those ever get fully tagged, the rest would be easy to handle with cursory checks and tag scripting.

Genjar said:
True, but only if they get tagged to the level where it matters.

The pregnant tag has over 8500+ posts, that's a lot to check one-by-one. Tagging projects such as that rarely get far, I'd rather not see an another tag that's only tagged for 10% of posts that should have it.

At the very least, I'd suggest focusing on the non-female pregnancy tags first. If those ever get fully tagged, the rest would be easy to handle with cursory checks and tag scripting.

If you're worried about tagging the posts, I was planning on doing it by myself. Future posts not receiving the tags are another thing to worry about, though.