Implicating mask_(marking) → facial_markings
Link to implication
Reason:
In line with gloves_(marking), etc, also, type of marking is exclusive to faces
Updated by ImpidiDinkaDoo
Topic: Tag Implication: mask_(marking) -> facial_markings
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Penguinempire-Dennis said:
Implicating mask_(marking) → facial_markings
Link to implicationReason:
In line with gloves_(marking), etc, also, type of marking is exclusive to faces
-1, I'd consider it more of an eye_markings type of marking, imply eye_markings instead.
THEN have THAT imply facial_markings.
Updated by anonymous