Aliasing endosomataphilia → endosomatophilia
Link to alias

Note: the original alias was misspelled

Reason:

Same thing, wrong spelling. Same goes for endosoma.

...No objections?
Also, implicate endosomatophilia to soft_vore.

Why are you trying to alias to a misspelling?

BlueDingo said:
Why are you trying to alias to a misspelling?

LOL! I glanced over that so many times, thinking "why is there a 1 letter difference" before dropping it.

BlueDingo said:
Why are you trying to alias to a misspelling?

Endosomatophilia is the correct spelling, at least according to eka's portal. https://aryion.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=82

EDIT: Wow, fuck me. Fixed.

cfgv said:
Endosomatophilia is the correct spelling, at least according to eka's portal. https://aryion.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=82

Read the request again. endosomatophlia. It's missing an I.

cfgv said:
EDIT: Wow, fuck me.

No thanks.

cfgv said:
...No objections?
Also, implicate endosomatophilia to soft_vore.

I don't think this should be implicated, as soft vore just means there was no chewing/tearing apart, whereas endosomatophilia implies that no harm is done to the one eaten. There can still be digestion in soft vore, which can be rather graphic/bloody sometimes.

bluedoberdor said:
I don't think this should be implicated, as soft vore just means there was no chewing/tearing apart, whereas endosomatophilia implies that no harm is done to the one eaten. There can still be digestion in soft vore, which can be rather graphic/bloody sometimes.

That's why it's endosomatophilia > soft vore, not soft vore > endosomatophilia.

cfgv said:
That's why it's endosomatophilia > soft vore, not soft vore > endosomatophilia.

Oh. Sorry, I thought you were asking for it to be the other way around.

Should I just create a new thread? Now nothing shows up when you search the alias.

cfgv said:
Should I just create a new thread? Now nothing shows up when you search the alias.

Edit your first post with a note about the incorrect link (link included) and the staff will figure it out.

Ok, anything else?

BlueDingo said:
Why are you trying to alias to a misspelling?

Again, why are you trying to alias to a misspelling?

"ensosomatAphilia"
is indeed the correct spelling. :T

Sasha721 said:
Again, why are you trying to alias to a misspelling?

"ensosomatAphilia"
is indeed the correct spelling. :T

Incorrect. It's spelled with an O, according to Eka's portal. https://aryion.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=82

In addition "endosomataphilia" has 232 results on Google and "endosomatophilia" has 30,000 results on Google.

if this wikifur page is anything to go by then the term Vorarephilia would probably work just as well and might actually be more accurate sounding.

surprisingly, i couldn't find an actual definition on google so i would say either of those terms would work since they seem to mean the same thing. well, there is a link to urban dictionary but that's not what i'd consider a reliable source for definitions of anything really. i mean, you could type the word penis in urban dictionary and probably end up with over 2-3+ dozen results all saying different things.

and seeing as the only actual definition to the word seems to be on that Eka's portal page... for all we know, it could just be some random term they came up with to describe the fetish... both in that and wikifur's cases.

my vote goes to either sticking with vore/soft_vore or vorarephilia since that one has a more thoroughly explained definition.

treos said:
if this wikifur page is anything to go by then the term Vorarephilia would probably work just as well and might actually be more accurate sounding.

surprisingly, i couldn't find an actual definition on google so i would say either of those terms would work since they seem to mean the same thing. well, there is a link to urban dictionary but that's not what i'd consider a reliable source for definitions of anything really. i mean, you could type the word penis in urban dictionary and probably end up with over 2-3+ dozen results all saying different things.

and seeing as the only actual definition to the word seems to be on that Eka's portal page... for all we know, it could just be some random term they came up with to describe the fetish... both in that and wikifur's cases.

my vote goes to either sticking with vore/soft_vore or vorarephilia since that one has a more thoroughly explained definition.

"Vorarephilia or vore,[1] also known as phagophilia and often misspelled as voreaphilia and voraphilia, is a fetish and paraphilia where arousal occurs from the idea of being eaten, eating another, or watching this process.[2] The fantasy may include digestion, painless or otherwise."

This is the distinction. Vorarephilia is just vore. Endosomatophilia is soft vore with a guarantee of being non-fatal. As for the definition, it's a simple concatenation of Greek words: endo (inner) somato (body) philia (love).

cfgv said:
"Vorarephilia or vore,[1] also known as phagophilia and often misspelled as voreaphilia and voraphilia, is a fetish and paraphilia where arousal occurs from the idea of being eaten, eating another, or watching this process.[2] The fantasy may include digestion, painless or otherwise."

This is the distinction. Vorarephilia is just vore. Endosomatophilia is soft vore with a guarantee of being non-fatal. As for the definition, it's a simple concatenation of Greek words: endo (inner) somato (body) philia (love).

"MAY include digestion"

that page covers various diffent forms of vore not just one. please don't cherry pick.

treos said:
"MAY include digestion"

that page covers various diffent forms of vore not just one. please don't cherry pick.

Well sure. Vore MAY include gore. Soft vore MAY include digestion. Endosomatophilia MAY include full tour. That's how we organize things. What you're suggesting is akin to replacing "foot fetish" and "foot focus" with "feet". Sure, it's a catch-all. But do people really want to sift through a bunch of non-related images because there isn't a tag to make that distinction?

I believe all issues have been resolved.

cfgv said:
I believe all issues have been resolved.

Nope, still no alias.

Furrin_Gok said:
Nope, still no alias.

Isn't that why I keep bumping this thread?

cfgv said:
Isn't that why I keep bumping this thread?

Bumping threads don't increase the likelihood of said thread getting approved/denied. Admins outright have the choice for which threads they investigate and even if they want to investigate any. Because of the human variable, the statistics don't truly change.

Siral_Exan said:
Bumping threads don't increase the likelihood of said thread getting approved/denied. Admins outright have the choice for which threads they investigate and even if they want to investigate any. Because of the human variable, the statistics don't truly change.

True, but when it drops off the first page, its chance of being seen drops significantly.

cfgv said:
True, but when it drops off the first page, its chance of being seen drops significantly.

...so? Maybe people do not have anything to contribute. Bumping the thread won't bring up new information in this case, everything appears to be laid out. An admin can come along and read it all, so unless you or another aren't providing all the information, there's nothing left to say.

Unless someone wants to argue the point some more, bumping the thread is not adding anything new. If it does sink behind the pages of the forum, you should have solace in the fact that you've said everything necessary and no one else is competing your statements.