Implicating double_anal -> double_penetration.

Reason:

confused said:
Implicating double_anal -> double_penetration.

Reason:

not really, because sometimes multiple orifices are penetrated multiple times, especially when it comes to tentacles.

Do you have an example of an image in which double_anal is not an example of double_penetration? Or could you at least provide a specific description of such an image?

I can think of no reason to deny this implication. Approved.