Implicating saint_andrew's_cross → bondage_furniture
Link to implication

Reason:

Implicate these too:

• sex_swing
• wooden_horse
• bondage_chair

EDIT: The tag implication saint_andrew's_cross -> bondage_furniture (forum #197079) has been approved by @furrypickle.

I'm curious, is sex swings really furniture? Seems more like bondage_gear to me.

On a side note, we have bondage_gear and quite a few bondage gear related tags but no implications.

It's not always a bondage item

Example: post #354563

Hence the name, a reference to... St. Andrew, who was killed by those means.

Well I guess technically that is still bondage, but that word has certain, well, connotations, so I don't know.

The tag implication saint_andrew's_cross -> bondage_furniture (forum #197079) has been approved by @furrypickle.

bondage_chair has already been implicated.

wooden_horse has at some point moved to wooden_horse_(device) which is a good thing. But I didn't implicate it because it's primarily a sadomasochism/torture device. And even though bondage is commonly used together with it, the bondage is not always attached to it either. It also can (and is) used sometimes without bondage at all. So it is not innately bondage furniture. So while an implication to somewhere in the bdsm objects group of tags does make sense, I don't think implicating it to bondage_furniture is the right place for it.

Similar logic with sex_swing. Sex swings do not always have restraints, and are not always used with restraints. So while an implication to somewhere in the bdsm objects group of tags does make sense, I don't think implicating it to bondage_furniture is the right place for it. Feel free to submit an implication to a more applicable tag for either of those though.