Implicating siamese_twins → conjoined
Link to implication

Reason:

same, siamese_twins is just a specification of conjoined involving 2 characters that are visibly siblings that are conjoined in some way.

EDIT: The tag implication siamese_twins -> conjoined (forum #202953) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.

bump

Is 2_heads in general siamese_twins?

Shouldn't we be using the term conjoined_twins in general? Also what about the case of amalgam characters. That could sometimes fit under the conjoined label but theyre not necessarily "twins"

GDelscribe said:
Shouldn't we be using the term conjoined_twins in general? Also what about the case of amalgam characters. That could sometimes fit under the conjoined label but theyre not necessarily "twins"

Probably, AFAIK Siamese is just related to Thailand and conjoined is the condition, but was popularized due to one case of this.

However, I don't see any problem with mix and match/multi characters, just tag them with hybrid, x_heads, x_legs, x_arms, x_tails, multi_body, etc. But it feels a little like this has to be tagged conjoined on a per post basis.

GDelscribe said:
Shouldn't we be using the term conjoined_twins in general? Also what about the case of amalgam characters. That could sometimes fit under the conjoined label but theyre not necessarily "twins"

+1 to aliasing to conjoined_twins instead.

Bumping, was just about to suggest. +1 to alias. Have conjoined twins also imply coinjoined as well, of course.

Related implications

• pushmi-pullyu → conjoined

The bulk update request #763 is active.

create implication conjoined_twins (336) -> conjoined (2611)
create implication pushmi-pullyu (134) -> conjoined (2611)

Reason: As discussed in this topic.

EDIT: The bulk update request #763 (forum #306889) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias siamese_twins -> conjoined_twins)

EDIT: The bulk update request #763 (forum #306889) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #763 (forum #306889) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias siamese_twins -> conjoined_twins)

The bulk update request #763 (forum #306889) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The tag implication siamese_twins -> conjoined (forum #202953) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.