So, if anybody is actually interested there's an uncensor request tag. I don't think many people know about it.
I've seen people on e621 uncensor images before, so I'm sure a few people would be willing to do it.
Updated by Foobaria
Posted under Art Talk
So, if anybody is actually interested there's an uncensor request tag. I don't think many people know about it.
I've seen people on e621 uncensor images before, so I'm sure a few people would be willing to do it.
Updated by Foobaria
About wiki page of uncensor_request. I'm not sure if I'm right, but shouldn't pics censored by pixelation or censor bars be also flagged for deletion besides parenting it. I think it counts as an inferior version.
Updated by anonymous
Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
About wiki page of uncensor_request. I'm not sure if I'm right, but shouldn't pics censored by pixelation or censor bars be also flagged for deletion besides parenting it. I think it counts as an inferior version.
I think some artists who did the original censored versions would disagree with your assessment...
Updated by anonymous
Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
About wiki page of uncensor_request. I'm not sure if I'm right, but shouldn't pics censored by pixelation or censor bars be also flagged for deletion besides parenting it. I think it counts as an inferior version.
I think the original should be kept because the uncensor is an edit, but if the original artist uncensored it, I think it should be deleted.
Updated by anonymous
Purposely editing someone else's content, and distributing it without their permission sounds like something that shouldn't be taken too lightly
In turn, creating a tag to do just that seems a bit unethical
Updated by anonymous
titaniachkt said:
Purposely editing someone else's content, and distributing it without their permission sounds like something that shouldn't be taken too lightly
Plenty of this already happens on e621 anyway. If an artist disagrees with an edit, they do have rights to take it down along with an easy to use takedown tool.
Updated by anonymous
titaniachkt said:
Purposely editing someone else's content, and distributing it without their permission sounds like something that shouldn't be taken too lightlyIn turn, creating a tag to do just that seems a bit unethical
What you say may not be incorrect, but if we all pussy-footed around all the time, nothing on the Internet would ever get done. Proactive/submissive courtesy, like anything else in life, should be taken in moderation.
Updated by anonymous