Implicating magazine_cover → magazine
Link to implication

Reason:

EDIT: The tag implication magazine_cover -> magazine (forum #206145) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.

Maxpizzle said:
Implicating magazine_cover → magazine
Link to implication

Reason:

-1. https://e621.net/wiki/show/magazine_cover The wiki even says that it is a drawing style. The image is the magazine, not an object in the image.

It's worth noting that I just created the wiki page for magazine a half hour ago. The definition I used there isn't necessarily the definition we have to go with.

Maxpizzle said:
It's worth noting that I just created the wiki page for magazine a half hour ago. The definition I used there isn't necessarily the definition we have to go with.

Oh. Well, mind explaining the differences (or similarities) so I can rephrase and (maybe) redecide? I might go make a feature thread about timestamps...

Siral_Eurgh-xan said:
Well, mind explaining the differences (or similarities) so I can rephrase and (maybe) redecide?

Huh? The rationale for magazine_cover implying magazine should be obvious, no?

Maxpizzle said:
Huh? The rationale for magazine_cover implying magazine should be obvious, no?

Depends, are you looking for characters reading a magazine, or settings that would have magazines in them; or are you looking for just the characters depicted in magazines, IE Playboy or a "Natural Health" nudes with fruits and vegetables.

The settings depicted in a magazine cover are to advertise with characters. The key word is advertise, the character is drawing attention to the magazine (the contents therein). The setting of a magazine is more urban, you'd find one while on the toilet or in some diners. What a person is wanting to look for is a bit of a distinction.

Siral_Eurgh-xan said: ...

You're overthinking this. A magazine is a magazine and a magazine cover is the cover of a magazine.

Maxpizzle said:
You're overthinking this. A magazine is a magazine and a magazine cover is the cover of a magazine.

To put it simply, magazine is used as an object within a drawing or painting while a magazine_cover is basically a all encompassing style of pinup that employs text and sometimes borders to make the painting or drawing seem like a cover(a style not a actual magazine or component there of). This is why it cant be implicated. eg. in the image vs. the image itself

>>>tag_group:art

Yeah, Siral has a point.
The magazine_cover tag is more of a composition tag, whereas magazine is an item tag, similar to painting and drawing.

Alright, point taken.

This leaves us with a tagging project:

• Most (all?) of the posts matching magazine magazine_cover should just have magazine_cover.
• Many of the posts matching magazine -magazine_cover should have magazine_cover but not magazine.

EDIT: This should now be completed, but if someone wants to check my work, I'd appreciate it.

The tag implication magazine_cover -> magazine (forum #206145) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.