Okay another attempt at cover related tags (lets find out if I get less red text this time).

Regarding "bedding" related tags covers and bed_sheet. I skimmed through covers and thought it looked pretty clean so I was maybe going to suggest some kind of implication or similar. But maybe there's issues with covers being mixed up with cover, or the verb form?

What I was thinking was maybe we could do with a general term e.g. bedding, something similar to:

• bedding (2) <- bedclothes (0)
• covers (211)
• bed_sheet (1181)

At first I tried to fit pillow and blanket (quilt (1), duvet (cover) (0), comforter (1)) into this but kind of gave up on that. That said I don't see much harm in using the bedding tag on its own, e.g. on a picture of a bed with a pillow, e.g. post #374320, though probably not a revolutionary new tag. But I guess if you guys don't like the covers tag, then my hope is that you won't hate on the bedding tag :P

Barely related: bed_sheet discussion: forum #144048

I agree with all of this. :P

I wonder if aliasing covers -> bed_covers might work to reinforce the tag.

+1 covers -> bed_covers

I've made the following changes:

• Implication: bed_sheet -> bedding (approved)
• Implication: bed_covers -> bedding (approved)
• Implication: blanket -> bedding (approved)
• Alias: covers -> bed_covers (approved)

I have a feeling that under_covers should be implicated to something, but I can't quite figure out what. Would implication to bed_covers work?

Genjar said:
I have a feeling that under_covers should be implicated to something, but I can't quite figure out what. Would implication to bed_covers work?

Or maybe bedding just to be safe.

Alternatively we could alias it to under_bedding.