This is basically just helping me find my own fetishes faster, and I'm not even sure there's enough examples to make it worth tagging.

The basic scenario is two or more passive partners lined up for one active partner, with the implication that either the active partner has their choice, or will be doing all of them in some order.

post #397261 and post #356239 provide fine examples of this. Bondage is not explicitly necessary, but I expect it features in most.

It possibly falls under other tags, but line_up is for height comparisons or police lineups regardless of rating, and queue is people waiting in line, either innocently or several active partners waiting to service a passive partner a la gangbang.

There's also a subset of this type that's also contained in my fetish, but could be discrete enough to not fall under the same tag. This subset consists of a like number of active and passive partners, paired off and lined up such that they can interact between pairs. post #152902, post #92690, and post #393037 are good examples. (Warning, all three are kinda cubby, but not tagged as such).

I also don't know what to actually call the tag for this fetish, since everything I can think of would also fit another, more innocent scenario.

Kirlian said:
The basic scenario is two or more passive partners lined up for one active partner, with the implication that either the active partner has their choice, or will be doing all of them in some order.

does post #330849 count?
or does passive = being penetrated

Munkelzahn said:
does post #330849 count?
or does passive = being penetrated

No, they're passively waiting to get sucked off, I'd say that counts.

Personally, I'm for this tag. It's easily sub-divided by other tags like straight, gay, pegging, blowjob, etc. and it provides a good searchability to that typeof image that we've lacked until now, to my knowledge.

I propose the tag "sex buffet"

Munkelzahn said:
does post #330849 count?
or does passive = being penetrated

Yeah, that definitely counts, like @123easy said.

Wyvrn said:
I propose the tag "sex buffet"

I like that. Surprised I didn't think of it.

Kirlian said:
Yeah, that definitely counts, like @123easy said.

I like that. Surprised I didn't think of it.

Sex buffet sounds *great*. Both for a laugh and for function.

Wyvrn said:
I propose the tag "sex buffet"

Lol. I love this.

Are we gonna do this still?

123easy said:
Are we gonna do this still?

Yes please can we do this

Couldn't we expand take_your_pick for the first case? I do like "assembly_line_sex" for the second, though.

You don,t really NEED approval to start using a tag (the worst that can happen is someone remove/rename/combine it with another tag), so I'll start using assembly_line_sex right now.

Circeus said:
You don,t really NEED approval to start using a tag (the worst that can happen is someone remove/rename/combine it with another tag), so I'll start using assembly_line_sex right now.

Just a note, assembly_line is already in use, so might wanna do assembly_line -> assembly_line_sex (unless someone finds an actual assembly line and tags it as such).

Chessax said:
Just a note, assembly_line is already in use, so might wanna do assembly_line -> assembly_line_sex (unless someone finds an actual assembly line and tags it as such).

ah, okay, then I need to think of a different tag for mine (which I applied to the second case, not the first). That's going to be parallel_sex.