Before I start using this tag, I wanted to ask what people think about it.

I'm vaguely thinking this to be too specific. Why a tag specifically for females, for started? How about just "clothed_feral" with underwear tags as needed?

I thought san_ruishin had a bunch of these but I was wrong.

There are many feral mlp posts with lingerie:

post #701868
post #697352
post #682171

aurel said:
Anyway, it could be nice, but searching feral and lingerie, already gives result which almost the same what feral_in_lingerie would give.

It would get rid of posts like this: post #744577

But you can also do that with feral lingerie -bestiality

I don't oppose this tag but a better use of your time might be tagging lingerie where it is untagged: post #730752 post #730625 (i tagged these ones)

Did that feral lingerie typhlosion pic get taken down?

It does seem rather specific. Clothed_feral would likely work better, it could be easily combined with various clothing tags in searches.

I'm all for clothed feral.

Before this gets too far along ...

Is not the wearing of clothing an anthropomorphization that would invalidate feral status?

(yes, I have always had a problem with MLP characters being labelled 'feral')

Sure, I may put a jacket on my dog when it is pissing rain outside so he stays warmer, and there is less drying off to do, but still ...

"Clothed" is a significant step away from "lingerie" since it includes overgarments too. Just saying.

Lance_Armstrong said:
I thought san_ruishin had a bunch of these but I was wrong.

Did that feral lingerie typhlosion pic get taken down?

Are you thinking of vcrow_shuu's quilava fixation?

post #512011

abadbird said:
Are you thinking of vcrow_shuu's quilava fixation?

post #512011

That's the one. I got the pokemon confused.

There you go, xxx feral_in_lingerie xxx

The san_ruishin pic I was thinking of is post #716012 but there is no lingerie.

+1 for either clothed_feral or feral_in_lingerie. The latter is more specific but it's also probably a huge chunk of what would be under clothed_feral (if that were thoroughly tagged) and kind of a kink of its own.

+1 to feral_in_lingerie. Clothed_feral is too much general.

+1 to clothed_feral, that seems a helpful tag. I'm not too sure about feral_in_lingerie because it seems oddly specific, but it wouldn't be too bad if it was also implicated to clothed_feral.

Since people can't agree, and I can sort of see the appeal of having a specific lingerie tag, I'd go with @aurel and keep both.

Here are my ideas:

implicating

• feral_in_lingerie -> clothed_feral
• feral_in_lingerie -> lingerie
• clothed_feral -> clothed
• clothed_feral -> feral

aliasing

• feral_in_clothing -> clothed_feral

Tuvalu's proposal looks pretty solid. Though my concern is that a fair amount of posts tagged as "feral_in_lingerie" may lack a "lingerie" tag unless users are diligent in adding it as well.

Wouldn't searching for "clothed_feral lingerie" generally yield similar results as "feral_in_lingerie", anyway?

Any tag can work if people tag it diligently.

If you tag it, they will come.

Lance_Armstrong said:
Any tag can work if people tag it diligently.

If you tag it, they will come.

What, we have tag fetishists now? The internet is even stranger than I thought.