So I saw we have both on_lap and sitting_on_lap. Is this a conscious choice or just something that has happened?

Sitting_on_lap is pretty straight forward, on_lap contains both sitting_on_lap, head_on_lap and quite a few spanking, and maybe some that wouldn't fit in either of those.

I went to implication/aliasing thoughts but maybe it just needs cleaning.

I would say implications would make sense for
sitting_on_lap --> on_lap
and maybe head_on_lap --> on_lap.

Beyond that I think on_lap -sitting_on_lap and on_lap -head_on_lap probably need cleanup to add relevant additional tags.

I'm also noticing a number of posts tagged on_lap that also contain mastery_position and chair_position, some of which are tagged, some of which are not. Probably just needs cleanup there as well since I don't believe implications would be appropriate.

Edit: Oh, just realized sitting_on_lap is already implicated to on_lap (same with head_on_lap, haha). Feel like it should also be implicated to sitting though.

atatat said:
I would say implications would make sense for
sitting_on_lap --> on_lap
and maybe head_on_lap --> on_lap.

Beyond that I think on_lap -sitting_on_lap and on_lap -head_on_lap probably need cleanup to add relevant additional tags.

I'm also noticing a number of posts tagged on_lap that also contain mastery_position and chair_position, some of which are tagged, some of which are not. Probably just needs cleanup there as well since I don't believe implications would be appropriate.

Edit: Oh, just realized sitting_on_lap is already implicated to on_lap (same with head_on_lap, haha). Feel like it should also be implicated to sitting though.

Well, it would make sense to implicate mastery/chair_position to sitting_on_lap.

Going to propose implications.