Topic: Tag Implication: crossdressing -> clothed

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

I might be wrong, but if a male was wearing just accessories, hair ribbons, garter belt, heels, make-up, etc., wouldn't that still count as crossdressing but not clothed?

Updated by anonymous

edidaf said:
I might be wrong, but if a male was wearing just accessories, hair ribbons, garter belt, heels, make-up, etc., wouldn't that still count as crossdressing but not clothed?

The wiki article for crossdressing states "A character wearing clothing associated with their opposite gender." so I'm not too sure if those would come under crossdressing or not, but this is the exact reason I said I wasn't too sure on this one. I was thinking that wearing the mentioned things would come under girly?

Updated by anonymous

edidaf said:
I might be wrong, but if a male was wearing just accessories, hair ribbons, garter belt, heels, make-up, etc., wouldn't that still count as crossdressing but not clothed?

Tuvalu said:
The wiki article for crossdressing states "A character wearing clothing associated with their opposite gender." so I'm not too sure if those would come under crossdressing or not, but this is the exact reason I said I wasn't too sure on this one. I was thinking that wearing the mentioned things would come under girly?

Based on what I see in girly -clothed and crossdressing -clothed that seems to be how these are treated (granted there is definitely a lot of overlap).

Other than a few mistagged things, I didn't see anything that would significantly conflict with the implication. A tentative +1

Updated by anonymous

  • 1