Updated by Peekaboo
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Updated by Peekaboo
dinklesven said:
Aliasing cum_transformation → cum_digestion
Link to aliasReason:
Are the same thing
Apparently, new cum tags are made every week, because this is not in my list.
Updated by anonymous
I don't think so.
Updated by anonymous
ShylokVakarian said:
Apparently, new cum tags are made every week, because this is not in my list.
Updated by anonymous
I disagree. While it's the most common use, cum_transformation doesn't have to be internal. Besides, cum_digestion is not a type of "digestion" to begin with, so I'd reverse the tag since transformation is much more straightforward anyway.
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
Go nuts
I've already gone nuts, that's the problem.
Updated by anonymous
Flipped and approved
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
Flipped and approved
While I don't agree with these terms being aliased together, I see that keeping them seperate wouldn't really matter seeing as some people tag simple cum vore (ie. turning some peep into cum) as transformation.
While that is true, for the most part, I always thought cum transformation should be saved for post where actual transformation takes place. That could be the vored peep turning into sentient cum, having said cum turn back or into another species etc. - Not just vore em' into regular cum that has no transformative properties.
Updated by anonymous
Peekaboo said:
While I don't agree with these terms being aliased together, I see that keeping them seperate wouldn't really matter seeing as some people tag simple cum vore (ie. turning some peep into cum) as transformation.While that is true, for the most part, I always thought cum transformation should be saved for post where actual transformation takes place. That could be the vored peep turning into sentient cum, having said cum turn back or into another species etc. - Not just vore em' into regular cum that has no transformative properties.
You make a good point. How about cum_vore? I could see how even that might get mixed up with cum_transformation, but since this is kind of niche to begin with it probably won't be much of an issue.
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
You make a good point. How about cum_vore? I could see how even that might get mixed up with cum_transformation, but since this is kind of niche to begin with it probably won't be much of an issue.
I'd be alright with that, but again - I doubt casual taggers/uploaders/users will use the tag in the right way.
It would help if cum_transformation and the suggested cum_vore tags had some simple hints in their wikis as to how to tag them properly.
I'd write it myself, but I doubt my basic English would get the point through to the reader.
Easy version.
cum vore post #750603
cum transformation post #282864
Updated by anonymous
Peekaboo said:
I'd be alright with that, but again - I doubt casual taggers/uploaders/users will use the tag in the right way.
It would help if cum_transformation and the suggested cum_vore tags had some simple hints in their wikis as to how to tag them properly.
I'd write it myself, but I doubt my basic English would get the point through to the reader.Easy version.
cum vore post #750603cum transformation post #282864
Alrighty, retagged them and applied the proper implications (as well as move the alias to the new tag).
I also made a couple basic wikis to hopefully get the point across.
Updated by anonymous
Cheers Para, looks good.
Updated by anonymous