Aliasing highlight → highlights
Link to alias

Reason:

same thing, probably

Knotty_Curls said:
Aliasing highlight → highlights
Link to alias

Reason:

same thing, probably

I know what you're trying to get at, and it's probably going to work, but there's almost several definitions for the word highlight.

i do not think the tag is useful in any way. i'd say invalidate it.

Mutisija said:
i do not think the tag is useful in any way. i'd say invalidate it.

But then we wouldn't be able to differentiate between the SpyParty pictures that have highlights show and those that don't. D:

Could you both please elaborate?

Knotty_Curls said:
Could you both please elaborate?

highlights is useless tag. it does not really benefit searching or blacklisting any way and nobody uses it. i think that it should be aliased to invalid_tag

I believe if it was more defined and tagged when applicable, it would be a useful way to search for the emo aesthetic without having an emo tag.

For the record, I think multicolored_hair and two_tone_hair may cover this. But I still believe it's useful.

Knotty_Curls said:
I believe if it was more defined and tagged when applicable, it would be a useful way to search for the emo aesthetic without having an emo tag.

For the record, I think multicolored_hair and two_tone_hair may cover this. But I still believe it's useful.

ohh wait like it means hair color?? i thought that it meant the highlights as in art term.
also it appears that some people are using it to tag as in art term.
post #718432 post #711885

Knotty_Curls said:
Could you both please elaborate?

It's a joke, I was referring to the public beta indie game known as SpyParty, where one player is a spy mingling in a party while completing tasks, while the other player is a sniper attempting to discern which partygoer is the spy and shoot him/her. The sniper has a pair of abilities that they can use to take notes called highlighting and lowlighting. Highlighting is used to mark a character that seems suspicious, whereas lowlighting is used to mark a character that does not seem suspicious.

Not 100% sure it should be invalidated at this point as the hair color meaning probably has some merit (even if the name isn't ideal). If anybody has ideas for how to go further with this, feel free to give your input. I'm going to go ahead and approve this in the meantime so that they are at least all in one place.