Updated by user 59725
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Updated by user 59725
Not same, but definitely should be considered for an implication IMO.
Updated by anonymous
Circeus said:
Not same, but definitely should be considered for an implication IMO.
Actually, now I think about it, it's entirely possible for a canine dildo to not have a knot or a knotted dildo to be based on the penis of another animal. I don't think either an alias or implication would work here, but manual tag changes. Which seems kind of excessive work for such a small tag.
Updated by anonymous
Denied for the reasons already mentioned.
I did imply the latter tag to dildo, however.
Updated by anonymous