Implicating midnight_sparkle_(eg) → equestria_girls
Link to implication
Reason:
"Newly revealed character" in the Friendship Games movie.
The same implication should also be applied to daydream_shimmer_(eg)".
Updated by user 59725
Topic: Tag Implication: midnight_sparkle_(eg) -> equestria_girls
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Approved both
Updated by anonymous
Would it also be appropriate in this case to add following implications:
midnight_sparkle_(eg) -> twilight_sparkle_(eg)
daydream_shimmer_(eg) -> sunset_shimmer_(eg)
Makes sense to me given they're just "powered up" versions of those characters.
Updated by anonymous
Wodahseht said:
Would it also be appropriate in this case to add following implications:midnight_sparkle_(eg) -> twilight_sparkle_(eg)
daydream_shimmer_(eg) -> sunset_shimmer_(eg)Makes sense to me given they're just "powered up" versions of those characters.
That seems reasonable based on how we've treated other characters. +1
Updated by anonymous