Implicating nude → barefoot
Link to implication
Reason:
If they're not barefoot, then they are by definition not nude (but quite possibly mostly_nude).
Updated by user 59725
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating nude → barefoot
Link to implication
If they're not barefoot, then they are by definition not nude (but quite possibly mostly_nude).
Updated by user 59725
Feet might not always be visible, though.
Updated by anonymous
Some animals don't even have feet. What about spirits that hover about without legs?
Updated by anonymous
Denied. Feet may be obscured, legs may end in hooves or nothing at all (amputation), and the tags themselves serve completely different purposes.
Updated by anonymous