Implicating breezie → equine
Link to implication

Reason:

They're basically fairy horses.

Wodahseht said:

They're basically fairy horses.

Fairy-like horses, to be more specific.

But I know the admins don't imply fictional species with other species. What if someone draws a humanized version of a breezie?

GameManiac said:
Fairy-like horses, to be more specific.

But I know the admins don't imply fictional species with other species. What if someone draws a humanized version of a breezie?

Then it would be a human. :P

Anthros are trickier though.

parasprite said:
Then it would be a human. :P

Anthros are trickier though.

No, I mean what if someone draws a humanized version of a breezie, and it's tagged as an equine.

That's why e621 doesn't imply the known species of fictitious animals.

GameManiac said:
No, I mean what if someone draws a humanized version of a breezie, and it's tagged as an equine.

If it looks like a human, it should be tagged as a human instead of a breezie.

And if someone draws one as a humanoid -- humanoid body with, let's say, antennae and insect wings -- then that'd probably fall under fairy by twys.

In either case, it wouldn't be tagged as breezie or equine.