Implicating dim_sum_(mlp) → friendship_is_magic
Link to implication

Reason:

http://www.equestriadaily.com/2015/07/ma-larson-wants-fan-art-of-this-chinese.html

If it's only an unofficial character it's better not to implicate friendship_is_magic. It probably shouldn't have the (mlp) suffix either.

Tuvalu said:
If it's only an unofficial character it's better not to implicate friendship_is_magic.

Agreed...at least that's been the rule in the past. I think the (mlp) suffix is fine though since it's specifically an mlp based fan character...and has already been handled that way for a number of others.

imo dim_sum_(character) would be better tag for it. and if you really need to implicate it to something, implicate it to fan_character

Wodahseht said:
I think the (mlp) suffix is fine though since it's specifically an mlp based fan character...and has already been handled that way for a number of others.

A lot of other fan characters have been aliased to (character) instead of (mlp). milky_way_(character), snowdrop_(character), button's_mom and others.

Tuvalu said:
If it's only an unofficial character it's better not to implicate friendship_is_magic. It probably shouldn't have the (mlp) suffix either.

A lot of other fan characters have been aliased to (character) instead of (mlp). milky_way_(character), snowdrop_(character) ...

Mutisija said:
imo dim_sum_(character) would be better tag for it. and if you really need to implicate it to something, implicate it to fan_character

Thirded.

I think all 'named' fan characters should have the fan_character implication, at the very least for blacklist purposes.

Changed to dim_sum -> my_little_pony and approved