reggie (femboy hooters and etc) created by nyxartstation
Viewing sample resized to 90% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #5038831 (learn more) show »
Description

told you

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • brat1x said:
    Why is AI getting so much attention? The picture isn't even edited. You could at least upload it to e6ai.net

    This ain't AI, chief.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • brat1x said:
    Why is AI getting so much attention? The picture isn't even edited. You could at least upload it to e6ai.net

    Dude I stream my art on discord please don't come here with that

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • nyxart said:
    its not i streamed that one too i didnt finish it because i didnt know how that post is from basically when i first started

    I’d like to see you actually make your claim and stream you drawing on some other service than Discord, or better yet, show a time-lapse on one of your other medias. I see some subtle hints that these some, if not most of these pictures are not 100% hand-drawn and most likely used as some form of AI-generation.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -9
  • unnoon said:
    I see some subtle hints that these some, if not most of these pictures are not 100% hand-drawn and most likely used as some form of AI-generation.

    I have looked at everything myself and would like some explanations too.

    • The number of fingers is often different on each hand. (5 fingers on one hand, but 4 on the other)
    • In post #4823150, the eye color and eyeliner is different for each eye.
    • In post #4846692, the human randomly turns into a half-furry.
    • In post #4969283, the bottom character's right hand is resting on nothing.

    If it turns out that Nyx is just super sloppy, then whatever, fair enough. I am just worried.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • ichhabs said:
    I have looked at everything myself and would like some explanations too.

    • The number of fingers is often different on each hand. (5 fingers on one hand, but 4 on the other)
    • In post #4823150, the eye color and eyeliner is different for each eye.
    • In post #4846692, the human randomly turns into a half-furry.
    • In post #4969283, the bottom character's right hand is resting on nothing.

    If it turns out that Nyx is just super sloppy, then whatever, fair enough. I am just worried.

    im talking to someone right now proving i make my art i am sloppy but i know my word means nothing on the internet so bare with me till this is settled thank you

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • ichhabs said:
    I have looked at everything myself and would like some explanations too.

    • The number of fingers is often different on each hand. (5 fingers on one hand, but 4 on the other)
    • In post #4823150, the eye color and eyeliner is different for each eye.
    • In post #4846692, the human randomly turns into a half-furry.
    • In post #4969283, the bottom character's right hand is resting on nothing.

    If it turns out that Nyx is just super sloppy, then whatever, fair enough. I am just worried.

    Also check post #4966719

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • unnoon said:
    I’d like to see you actually make your claim and stream you drawing on some other service than Discord, or better yet, show a time-lapse on one of your other medias. I see some subtle hints that these some, if not most of these pictures are not 100% hand-drawn and most likely used as some form of AI-generation.

    ichhabs said:
    I have looked at everything myself and would like some explanations too.

    • The number of fingers is often different on each hand. (5 fingers on one hand, but 4 on the other)
    • In post #4823150, the eye color and eyeliner is different for each eye.
    • In post #4846692, the human randomly turns into a half-furry.
    • In post #4969283, the bottom character's right hand is resting on nothing.

    If it turns out that Nyx is just super sloppy, then whatever, fair enough. I am just worried.

    This artist is 100% legit and I apologize for starting the rumor that their art is Ai. They do not use Ai, they do not trace. I have been talking with them and going through their stuff and there is no shenanigans afoot here

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • whygena said:
    This artist is 100% legit and I apologize for starting the rumor that their art is Ai. They do not use Ai, they do not trace. I have been talking with them and going through their stuff and there is no shenanigans afoot here

    Well then, I'd like to apologize for my comment I'd made. My only reason was that I followed the beliefs from Whygena's previous tweet claiming it was AI. Then I looked at a lot of your art and only looked at it negatively from there. I just saw Nyx's recent tweet of them showing a video of them sketching their recent art. I've blind-sighted myself for only viewing your art bad and I feel bad for doing so.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • unnoon said:
    Well then, I'd like to apologize for my comment I'd made. My only reason was that I followed the beliefs from Whygena's previous tweet claiming it was AI. Then I looked at a lot of your art and only looked at it negatively from there. I just saw Nyx's recent tweet of them showing a video of them sketching their recent art. I've blind-sighted myself for only viewing your art bad and I feel bad for doing so.

    Please don't feel bad its completely ok I'm not upset at anyone! ❤️

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • nyxart said:
    Dude I stream my art on discord please don't come here with that

    yeah but everyone knows you're just a highly sophisticated AI program that just happens to operate one some old meat based hardware that the devs wont even let you upgrade or give you spare parts for anymore.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • burner626 said:
    yeah but everyone knows you're just a highly sophisticated AI program that just happens to operate one some old meat based hardware that the devs wont even let you upgrade or give you spare parts for anymore.

    you know too much 😐

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • @whygena, i already made a comment elsewhere about my concerns, but i feel i should place more details here. Most of this i typed out a week ago. This was primarily made to manage my own nerves.

    I'm not convinced that nyxart is innocent. i'll preface this by saying 1: that i made this account with the explicit purpose to type this out,
    2: that i say all this more to help
    my anxiety and shakiness more than anything, my paranoia coming from the AI flood over in reggie's tag on rule34, and
    3: i checked on my own before whygena made the accusation, and already came to my own conclusion.
    This is a bit of a long one

    Even though nyx has a video timelapse of their drawing, and they stream their drawings, the streaming software they use is likely using a "capture window" style of recording, which doesn't show any windows placed on top.

    This would allow them to use a "see through windows" option to overlay another picture over their art software without it being seen by the viewers.
    See:
    https://www.mobzystems.com/tools/seethroughwindows/

    Their behavior after getting labelled AI is also notable, lashing out at every who calls it so, and going as far as calling whygena gullible.

    Furthermore, rule34 was flooded with AI generated works on reggie, mimicking a suspiciously similar style to nyx.
    See:
    https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=reggie_%28whygena%29+ai_generated+&pid=0

    All of nyx's works seem to have inconsistancies the like of which are consistantly made by AI.
    See brazillian miku's strange earings, toes eyelashes and fingers:
    https://art.ngfiles.com/medium_views/5988000/5988204_1141423_nyxart_brazilian-miku.fc3113a3cdc3f86cec09aa6a7530df69.webp?f1724770564

    And nicole watterson's eyelash dilemma:
    https://art.ngfiles.com/images/5976000/5976092_1126382_nyxart_nicole.b2efc0b212967ba408522ef66f21f767.webp?f1724378168

    I believe they've tricked you, whygena. Which i don't blame you for, this stuff is stupid and complicated. Again, this is more for my own anxiety than to prove that anybody is guilty or anything, please don't take this the wrong way.

    It's incredibly frustrating that i feel this way about all this.
    sorry it's so long

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • clunklord said:
    @whygena, i already made a comment elsewhere about my concerns, but i feel i should place more details here. Most of this i typed out a week ago. This was primarily made to manage my own nerves.

    I'm not convinced that nyxart is innocent. i'll preface this by saying 1: that i made this account with the explicit purpose to type this out,
    2: that i say all this more to help
    my anxiety and shakiness more than anything, my paranoia coming from the AI flood over in reggie's tag on rule34, and
    3: i checked on my own before whygena made the accusation, and already came to my own conclusion.
    This is a bit of a long one

    Even though nyx has a video timelapse of their drawing, and they stream their drawings, the streaming software they use is likely using a "capture window" style of recording, which doesn't show any windows placed on top.

    This would allow them to use a "see through windows" option to overlay another picture over their art software without it being seen by the viewers.
    See:
    https://www.mobzystems.com/tools/seethroughwindows/

    Their behavior after getting labelled AI is also notable, lashing out at every who calls it so, and going as far as calling whygena gullible.

    Furthermore, rule34 was flooded with AI generated works on reggie, mimicking a suspiciously similar style to nyx.
    See:
    https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=reggie_%28whygena%29+ai_generated+&pid=0

    All of nyx's works seem to have inconsistancies the like of which are consistantly made by AI.
    See brazillian miku's strange earings, toes eyelashes and fingers:
    https://art.ngfiles.com/medium_views/5988000/5988204_1141423_nyxart_brazilian-miku.fc3113a3cdc3f86cec09aa6a7530df69.webp?f1724770564

    And nicole watterson's eyelash dilemma:
    https://art.ngfiles.com/images/5976000/5976092_1126382_nyxart_nicole.b2efc0b212967ba408522ef66f21f767.webp?f1724378168

    I believe they've tricked you, whygena. Which i don't blame you for, this stuff is stupid and complicated. Again, this is more for my own anxiety than to prove that anybody is guilty or anything, please don't take this the wrong way.

    It's incredibly frustrating that i feel this way about all this.
    sorry it's so long

    I'm not sure but i already went over most of this in whygenas DMs which is why im not taking this seriously and I'm not sure what "capture windows" are but i made that piece from scratch and the time laps looks the way all timelapse on clip studio paint do and ill be happy to also send you the original file i react the way i do because i dont hate anyone that likes me or not i comment on everyone and react calmly to question or concerns im not a expert in being a online artist seeing i just started but i still try hard to help I've talked with a lot of people that's pointed out the same things as you and ive gave them the same answer i gave whygena if you are still concerned you can contact me on my X newgrounds or even discord and please dont feel bad or beat yourself up if you were false all my followers mean a lot to me even the negative ones so please clunk lord i really do hope you feel better soon ~Nyx!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • nyxart said:
    I'm not sure but i already went over most of this in whygenas DMs which is why im not taking this seriously and I'm not sure what "capture windows" are but i made that piece from scratch and the time laps looks the way all timelapse on clip studio paint do and ill be happy to also send you the original file i react the way i do because i dont hate anyone that likes me or not i comment on everyone and react calmly to question or concerns im not a expert in being a online artist seeing i just started but i still try hard to help I've talked with a lot of people that's pointed out the same things as you and ive gave them the same answer i gave whygena if you are still concerned you can contact me on my X newgrounds or even discord and please dont feel bad or beat yourself up if you were false all my followers mean a lot to me even the negative ones so please clunk lord i really do hope you feel better soon ~Nyx!

    i can imagine you not knowing what "capture window" means, since i am using terminology from the niche screen recorder i toy around with, it just means it records only what the program you're trying to record would show, even if it's covered up by some other program. you likely use discord's screen share stuff, which does that too.

    the original file would not prove anything. the timelapse would not be affected with the method i'm describing. i'm stating that you've used a transparent image that you can click through for tracing. one that wouldn't be seen in discord's screen sharing view.

    in all of your works, there are a lot of strange inconsistencies, some of which are consistent. eyelashes and feet being weird, jewellery being heavily mismatched, to name three examples. here,
    i'm not sure why a real artist wouldn't just draw a new angle or pose for the 3rd panel. at this point, wouldn't it make sense to just copy panel 2 and just change some really small things? tons of people do that.
    panel 2 and 3 just look like you told an AI something along the lines of "now draw him face down, in a pillow getting fucked" and then "now draw him blushing and cumming"

    i genuinely believe that you trace AI generated imagery. i don't believe you can prove your innocence to me.
    also maybe look into using punctuation for your replies, it's unrelated and nitpicky but it helps your credibility, just a little bit.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • clunklord said:

    i can imagine you not knowing what "capture window" means, since i am using terminology from the niche screen recorder i toy around with, it just means it records only what the program you're trying to record would show, even if it's covered up by some other program. you likely use discord's screen share stuff, which does that too.

    the original file would not prove anything. the timelapse would not be affected with the method i'm describing. i'm stating that you've used a transparent image that you can click through for tracing. one that wouldn't be seen in discord's screen sharing view.

    furthermore, in all of your works, there are a lot of strange inconsistencies, some of which are consistent. eyelashes and feet being weird, jewellery being heavily mismatched, to name three examples. here,
    i'm not sure why a real artist wouldn't just draw a new angle or pose for the 3rd panel. at this point, wouldn't it make sense to just copy panel 2 and just change some really small things? tons of people do that.
    panel 2 and 3 just look like you told an AI something along the lines of "now draw him face down, in a pillow getting fucked" and then "now draw him blushing and cumming"

    i genuinely believe that you trace AI generated imagery. i don't believe you can prove your innocence to me.
    also maybe look into using punctuation for your replies, it's unrelated and nitpicky but it helps your credibility, just a little bit.

    whatever floats your boat dude how i spell is my concern and i already dealt with this last week and it and finished it im not doing it again im going to keep drawing you can keep looking if it makes you feel better but but i just dont care enough to show you why

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • clunklord said:

    i can imagine you not knowing what "capture window" means, since i am using terminology from the niche screen recorder i toy around with, it just means it records only what the program you're trying to record would show, even if it's covered up by some other program. you likely use discord's screen share stuff, which does that too.

    the original file would not prove anything. the timelapse would not be affected with the method i'm describing. i'm stating that you've used a transparent image that you can click through for tracing. one that wouldn't be seen in discord's screen sharing view.

    in all of your works, there are a lot of strange inconsistencies, some of which are consistent. eyelashes and feet being weird, jewellery being heavily mismatched, to name three examples. here,
    i'm not sure why a real artist wouldn't just draw a new angle or pose for the 3rd panel. at this point, wouldn't it make sense to just copy panel 2 and just change some really small things? tons of people do that.
    panel 2 and 3 just look like you told an AI something along the lines of "now draw him face down, in a pillow getting fucked" and then "now draw him blushing and cumming"

    i genuinely believe that you trace AI generated imagery. i don't believe you can prove your innocence to me.
    also maybe look into using punctuation for your replies, it's unrelated and nitpicky but it helps your credibility, just a little bit.

    The brown thing in the background throws me off also lol

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • "you can contact me on my X newgrounds or even discord"
    to
    "i just dont care enough to show you why"
    is a true combo, turns out. so few frames, too...

    i've sent this guy a message elsewhere, and all i really got was a rant about how i'm "another person on the internet" and how if i hate their stuff so much i can just block them. i really can't just block them though, since the way i look at twitter doesn't allow me to block, reply to, or text anybody, and whygena has retweeted their stuff, but that's beside the point. pretty interesting response, overall, since you state that you've sent proof to other people, but refuse to for me, the guy questioning your process.

    i'm gonna lay this out. i don't think you can prove that you don't trace AI. this isn't because i'm stubborn or stuck in my ways or anything. it's because i doubt you have anything that would truly prove this. you would never have the proof you need, if your whole career is just AI tracing.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • clunklord said:
    "you can contact me on my X newgrounds or even discord"
    to
    "i just dont care enough to show you why"
    is a true combo, turns out. so few frames, too...

    i've sent this guy a message elsewhere, and all i really got was a rant about how i'm "another person on the internet" and how if i hate their stuff so much i can just block them. i really can't just block them though, since the way i look at twitter doesn't allow me to block, reply to, or text anybody, and whygena has retweeted their stuff, but that's beside the point. pretty interesting response, overall, since you state that you've sent proof to other people, but refuse to for me, the guy questioning your process.

    i'm gonna lay this out. i don't think you can prove that you don't trace AI. this isn't because i'm stubborn or stuck in my ways or anything. it's because i doubt you have anything that would truly prove this. you would never have the proof you need, if your whole career is just AI tracing.

    well your coming to my dm's saying "there's no point on sending you proof because you wont believe it" so why would i waste my time trying to argue with some random furry online

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • mistys_ref said:
    well your coming to my dm's saying "there's no point on sending you proof because you wont believe it" so why would i waste my time trying to argue with some random furry online

    "you can send me whatever proof you have that you don't trace AI. i probably won't believe any of it, but worth a shot i suppose."

    this is, copy/pasted, what i sent. still, not showing anything, and instead lashing out at me, is a decently good sign, to me, that you don't WANT me to see this proof, for whatever reason.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • clunklord said:
    "you can send me whatever proof you have that you don't trace AI. i probably won't believe any of it, but worth a shot i suppose."

    this is, copy/pasted, what i sent. still, not showing anything, and instead lashing out at me, is a decently good sign, to me, that you don't WANT me to see this proof, for whatever reason.

    did i not show my evidence to the people that asked at the moment its been a week i don't care anymore

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • mistys_ref said:
    did i not show my evidence to the people that asked at the moment its been a week i don't care anymore

    you may have shown them, but i haven't seen it, and i know of the technologies that would be in play if you are tracing AI. from my eyes, it looks like you're hiding something, rather than it just being that you don't care.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • carnivore4lyf said:
    Can we get back to enjoying a furry rat mouse femboy Eldritch spellcaster please?

    i believe they traced AI generated slop, deceived whygena into thinking it's not that, and that he's a jerk for thinking it is. they aren't helping their case by lashing out. i don't think AI slop is even allowed here.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • clunklord said:
    i believe they traced AI generated slop, deceived whygena into thinking it's not that, and that he's a jerk for thinking it is. they aren't helping their case by lashing out. i don't think AI slop is even allowed here.

    at this point your harassing me i legit already showed everything i have and yet you still complain you dont even know me or my art process im pretty sure you could be doing other things for your on life not instigating mines

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • mistys_ref said:
    at this point your harassing me i legit already showed everything i have and yet you still complain you dont even know me or my art process im pretty sure you could be doing other things for your on life not instigating mines

    you have not shown anything you have to me. the only bit of your art process i've seen is the timelapse i saw on your twitter. also funny that you jump straight to abuse accusations, while you're exploiting people's trust and posting generated works.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • clunklord said:
    you have not shown anything you have to me. the only bit of your art process i've seen is the timelapse i saw on your twitter. also funny that you jump straight to abuse accusations, while you're exploiting people's trust and posting generated works.

    alright dude you do i got better things to do like i said cya

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • flagged for "tracing another artist's work" since AI imagery is just other people's stolen works, thrown into a machine, and this is a trace of that AI stuff. just leaving this for whoever checks that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • clunklord said:
    flagged for "tracing another artist's work" since AI imagery is just other people's stolen works, thrown into a machine, and this is a trace of that AI stuff. just leaving this for whoever checks that.

    So what your saying is you think my art is AI with no way to prove it since I already proved the same people wrong and your upset and sticking to your opinion because I'm choosing with my own right not to show you some random person my art files that I already showed to the person I made the fanart for in the first place because when the rumor started alot of people switched and started all of a sudden seeing things too then apologized after they were wrong your going off of straight intuition and harassing me not because I'm scared of a random person but because this has been going on for almost 2 weeks your a adult act like one

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • mistys_ref said:
    So what your saying is you think my art is AI with no way to prove it since I already proved the same people wrong and your upset and sticking to your opinion because I'm choosing with my own right not to show you some random person my art files that I already showed to the person I made the fanart for in the first place because when the rumor started alot of people switched and started all of a sudden seeing things too then apologized after they were wrong your going off of straight intuition and harassing me not because I'm scared of a random person but because this has been going on for almost 2 weeks your a adult act like one

    i'm not just some guy on the internet, i'm some guy on the internet who has the technological knowhow to say with absolute certainty that you're a hack.

    it's funny you're saying i'm "going off of straight intuition" when i have provided proof backing my claims above. your refusal to provide me proof, when i've gone far more in-depth and technical than i'd guess anybody else has, says to me that you're scared i would find more evidence for my end.

    AI image generators have a set of things they are particularly bad at. simple things that humans don't normally make mistakes with as regularly as you do.

    i'll tell you now that there is just about one thing that can really prove to me that you don't trace AI, something only real artists have. and at this point, you're gonna need a lot of that. i won't tell you what it is, because if you're real, you should already know.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • mistys_ref said:
    So what your saying is you think my art is AI with no way to prove it since I already proved the same people wrong and your upset and sticking to your opinion because I'm choosing with my own right not to show you some random person my art files that I already showed to the person I made the fanart for in the first place because when the rumor started alot of people switched and started all of a sudden seeing things too then apologized after they were wrong your going off of straight intuition and harassing me not because I'm scared of a random person but because this has been going on for almost 2 weeks your a adult act like one

    Inconsistent anatomy, inconsistent shading, inconsistent background with a weird brown thing on a second panel, the hooters logo on the shirt is different from the Parent post, Reggie's facial features are inconsistent, his mouth is somewhat smudged on a second panel (in a way no person could do), his eyelashes are hella inconsistent and range from two to three and their thickness is always too weird, the eyes look like an attempt at generic anime eyes, which AI assumed Reggie's eyes were, it can't comprehend the pies, the AI assumed that his nips were shadows, so there is a strange pink spot on his chest on the second panel, the AI assumed that the bulge in the shorts would be of a vagina, so it looks more like pussy, not a sack, do I even need to say more? Because I can. Also, I did go through your posts and even the cat, that you've had as your pfp, has some obvious AI features.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • somewhatarat said:
    Inconsistent anatomy, inconsistent shading, inconsistent background with a weird brown thing on a second panel, the hooters logo on the shirt is different from the Parent post, Reggie's facial features are inconsistent, his mouth is somewhat smudged on a second panel (in a way no person could do), his eyelashes are hella inconsistent and range from two to three and their thickness is always too weird, the eyes look like an attempt at generic anime eyes, which AI assumed Reggie's eyes were, it can't comprehend the pies, the AI assumed that his nips were shadows, so there is a strange pink spot on his chest on the second panel, the AI assumed that the bulge in the shorts would be of a vagina, so it looks more like pussy, not a sack, do I even need to say more? Because I can. Also, I did go through your posts and even the cat, that you've had as your pfp, has some obvious AI features.

    If it wasn't for me being busy at the moment, I could've send you a whole document with pictures included

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • somewhatarat said:
    Inconsistent anatomy, inconsistent shading, inconsistent background with a weird brown thing on a second panel, the hooters logo on the shirt is different from the Parent post, Reggie's facial features are inconsistent, his mouth is somewhat smudged on a second panel (in a way no person could do), his eyelashes are hella inconsistent and range from two to three and their thickness is always too weird, the eyes look like an attempt at generic anime eyes, which AI assumed Reggie's eyes were, it can't comprehend the pies, the AI assumed that his nips were shadows, so there is a strange pink spot on his chest on the second panel, the AI assumed that the bulge in the shorts would be of a vagina, so it looks more like pussy, not a sack, do I even need to say more? Because I can. Also, I did go through your posts and even the cat, that you've had as your pfp, has some obvious AI features.

    Well I prefer to take this convo to discord you guys are taking up the comment section and e621 has a type
    max my user is cra8zy

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • mistys_ref said:
    Well I prefer to take this convo to discord you guys are taking up the comment section and e621 has a type
    max my user is cra8zy

    well i prefer this convo remains public, and on the page that i'm personally upset about. this way, it would be clear that i'm not faking the texts, or leaving anything out, should i need to share anything. your frequent outbursts should remain here. if you do still have that proof you're hiding, you have my newgrounds. and if the mods feel strongly about this, then they'll do something.

    also my discord is gonna remain private.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • clunklord said:
    well i prefer this convo remains public, and on the page that i'm personally upset about. this way, it would be clear that i'm not faking the texts, or leaving anything out, should i need to share anything. your frequent outbursts should remain here. if you do still have that proof you're hiding, you have my newgrounds. and if the mods feel strongly about this, then they'll do something.

    also my discord is gonna remain private.

    suit yourself dude i know what I'm doing I know I'm not AI and how long i learned to draw so you can point out all you need i genially couldn't care less mind you i dont get paid for this as you see so i don't have to act formal or care peace ima do some shenanigans!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • mistys_ref said:
    suit yourself dude i know what I'm doing I know I'm not AI and how long i learned to draw so you can point out all you need i genially couldn't care less mind you i dont get paid for this as you see so i don't have to act formal or care peace ima do some shenanigans!

    "I don't get paid for this" Aren't you looking to set up a patreon? also, don't you take commissions?

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • mistys_ref said:
    suit yourself dude i know what I'm doing I know I'm not AI and how long i learned to draw so you can point out all you need i genially couldn't care less mind you i dont get paid for this as you see so i don't have to act formal or care peace ima do some shenanigans!

    mistys_ref said:
    Well I prefer to take this convo to discord you guys are taking up the comment section and e621 has a type
    max my user is cra8zy

    Well I'd prefer for you to respond to the points I've made right there. I don't need to see any layers and stuff you said you've been showing, I need you to answer up

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • ... and i have yet to even SEE any proof. besides what was posted on twitter, which is far from enough.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • alright, i've thought about it for a minute, so i'm gonna be blunt here. no hints or nothing. maybe english isn't your first language or something, so i should account for that.

    TLDR: you should publicly upload several recent drawings from a physical sketch book or something, if you've drawn in anything like that, to show that you're not tracing AI. the more the merrier. having public physical sketches will even deter other people from making these accusations. if you aren't legitimate, i'd say i have a decently good eye for seeing that.

    elaboration, coming right up. earlier, i'd have been fine with using 2 pictures of your physical work in my newgrounds PMs as enough proof. but, with your attitude this whole time, repeatedly saying that you don't use AI rather than provide counter arguments or anything, 2 privately shared shots aren't enough anymore.

    your works look extremely like these posts on rule34: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=user%3awiggy55

    all of your works have insanely weird oddities, such as significantly mismatched jewellery, eyelashes and the sort.
    here's the jewellery example:
    https://art.ngfiles.com/medium_views/5988000/5988204_1141423_nyxart_brazilian-miku.fc3113a3cdc3f86cec09aa6a7530df69.webp?f1724770564

    here's the eyelashes example:
    https://art.ngfiles.com/images/5976000/5976092_1126382_nyxart_nicole.b2efc0b212967ba408522ef66f21f767.webp?f1724378168

    plus, the backgrounds in your comics tend to not look like they take place in the same room. even this reggie piece is a good enough example for that.

    you use an art program that does not have any private layers that are hidden from timelapses, and you stream your work. however, there are apps to tip-toe around this.
    here's the "see through windows" program as an example.
    https://www.mobzystems.com/tools/seethroughwindows/

    as for the discord streaming, discord's screen sharing system does not show programs that are on top of what you're recording. it would record the art program, but not the workaround.

    if you're legit, i'm sorry for dragging this out so long, and insulting you like this. i should've started with this kind of suggestion forever ago. i was just too shaky to even begin to think of any other way.
    if you're not legit, please disregard the above statement.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Versperus

    Moderator

    Enough. No more arguments or debates here, or we'll start handing out disruptive records.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • fair enough, i did say "if the mods feel strongly about this"

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1