theincognitoman said:
Is this Legal? Is this Child Porn?

I don't see why it should be illegal for anyone to look at porn containing pokemons. It's fine.

A pokemon is not a "child". Never was, nor it will. That's like saying "The show's purpose is to show how these "children" aka Pokemons fight other "children", now that doesn't sound correct, right? Same thing as saying a pokemon is a child. It isn't.
Besides that, there is a "young" tag on most posts that contains a "pokemon" tag, the pokemon aren't exactly "young", even if it the pokemon itself might be seem or not as young.

rezorxray said:
I don't see why it should be illegal for anyone to look at porn containing pokemons. It's fine.

Lol cope. This is hot

interesting 'chu here 👀
always neat to see how people add pawpads to a pikachu when they dont typically contain them
pikachu looks like he's spacing out a bit, so i would hope they're having a nice time there, they seem quite relaxed for the most part!
can almost hear the crickets in the background despite being a gif, nice cool night air, but a warm pikachu!

I will never get tired of lewd Pikas. This one's super cute and in a hot position. Nice shot of the Chu junk. Awesome artwork!

theincognitoman said:
Is this Legal? Is this Child Porn?

Say it with me everyone. Drawings aren't real and they don't have human rights.

rezorxray said:
I don't see why it should be illegal for anyone to look at porn containing pokemons. It's fine.

A pokemon is not a "child". Never was, nor it will. That's like saying "The show's purpose is to show how these "children" aka Pokemons fight other "children", now that doesn't sound correct, right? Same thing as saying a pokemon is a child. It isn't.
Besides that, there is a "young" tag on most posts that contains a "pokemon" tag, the pokemon aren't exactly "young", even if it the pokemon itself might be seem or not as young.

whyknot said:
Say it with me everyone. Drawings aren't real and they don't have human rights.

I agree with you both.

Some peeps think like, when someone likes a pic between a human and a creature, that makes it bestiality and that whoever liked it is into real life bestiality, just like when someone likes a pic like human/cub and that would make them a pedo. But, the thing is, these pics that were liked by that someone, doesn't define who and what sort of person they really are. Only actual real life actions will lead to that fact. Not a person liking a certain pic because it's artwork, and last I checked. Anyone can make artworks, especially through a.i. (it isn't a illegal to like artworks, they aren't real, it's fiction)

Then again, my point is that whatever pics someone put a like on it, uploaded or just has a kink about it, it doesn't define them until they actually do something in real life that is actually considered "illegal" and "wrong". Now THAT makes sense.