Sly bunny.

Ah, so its Judy thats bluedicking Nick.
Atleast it ain't cuckery, but thats still cheating. LowBlow. :(

I'm gonna wait a few more pages before making any claims, but I REALLY don't know how to feel about this.

DragonHugger said:
Ah, so its Judy thats bluedicking Nick.
Atleast it ain't cuckery, but thats still cheating. LowBlow. :(

It's 100% cuckoldry. That's uh, what it is.

Sparks127 said:
I'm gonna wait a few more pages before making any claims, but I REALLY don't know how to feel about this.

Pretty sure this is the last page.

Borba, I know that's you. Slither back to whatever hole you crawled out of, and don't come back.

"Judy oh Judy you are such a..."

Nick needs to find himself a vixen!

ErnestoRoo said:
Sly bunny.

She learned from the best. :P

I don’t like where this is going. Like everyone is saying I’m getting major Borba vibes

Moroze said:
Aaaaand we're going Borba..

Ah shit, here we go again.

Oh gods why... I just wanted something fluffy to start of the day...

Another unlikable Zootopia comic.

Moroze said:
I'm more referring to the character assassination and forced drama of using established personalities for this.

Y'know,the whole "Judy's unfaithful / possibly unloving. Nick is spineless or a clueless cuck".

It's essentially fanfiction. There's no rule saying they have to follow the most popular interpretation of their personalities. This portrayal is different from the norm and that's absolutely acceptable. You're welcome not to like it of course, but it isn't "wrong".

I'm starting to see a trend - people feel they have to "protect" Nick and Judy from being in content that portrays them in a different or negative light. It's a little unsettling.

Qwazzy said:
It's a little unsettling.

Why would you find this unsettling?

People have always empathized with fictional characters. Without this empathy, a lot of fiction would not work.

Because people feel connected, we should never be surprised when distortions of these characters provoke anger. While it's true that Nick and Judy are not canonically a couple, it's also true that they respect and trust each other. The casual breaking of these bonds, here and in the Borba stuff, is what people find so annoying.

Ruinruined said:
Why would you find this unsettling?

People have always empathized with fictional characters. Without this empathy, a lot of fiction would not work.

I should probably clarify what I mean a little better.
Having that feeling, in itself, isn't unsettling or bad.
Seeing people downvote and criticize a fictional work because of that feeling is what unsettles me. It's like they're saying "no, this isn't how Nick and Judy would act, so it's a bad comic".

Qwazzy said:
Seeing people downvote and criticize a fictional work because of that feeling is what unsettles me. It's like they're saying "no, this isn't how Nick and Judy would act, so it's a bad comic".

I would call this an excellent reason to reject any comic about beloved characters. Why should our emotional responses to the treatment of the characters be any less valid than, say, an aesthetic response to the script and the drawings? Why should we limit our assessments to the purely technical aspects of a comic?

DragonHugger said:
Ah, so its Judy thats bluedicking Nick.
Atleast it ain't cuckery, but thats still cheating. LowBlow. :(

Sparks127 said:
I'm gonna wait a few more pages before making any claims, but I REALLY don't know how to feel about this.

I would just note that this is a prequel to another picture that the artist did, in which it's revealed that cuck is Nick's fetish and that he's 100% into this sort of thing.

Whether or not that will appease those wanting more canon personalities I don't know. But there shouldn't be any Borba-esque emotional manipulation or drama, just fetish sex. I personally don't mind this take on the characters, it's different. But others may object.

Either way, given this took a year to produce I wouldn't expect much to happen anytime soon.

Ruinruined said:
I would call this an excellent reason to reject any comic about beloved characters. Why should our emotional responses to the treatment of the characters be any less valid than, say, an aesthetic response to the script and the drawings? Why should we limit our assessments to the purely technical aspects of a comic?

Why is it an excellent reason here and not elsewhere? Fanfiction of many different settings, many different universes, many different characters are out there, and for most of them the readers are capable of understanding it's an unofficial fan representation of those things in the artist/writer's own style. Characters hook up with other characters that would never happen in the official storyline. They make decisions they'd never make. They like and hate things that don't match up. And the vast majority of the time, it's fine, and nobody reading the story has any problem in comprehending it or at least suspending disbelief.

Then there's examples like Nick and Judy, where people seem to get upset when they're portrayed differently than the average.

I don't understand why an unusual representation can't be allowed to exist. It's just how fanfiction works. There's the official side, with the movie and whatever else media-wise coming from the writing team - and the unofficial side, being all the fanfics and artwork and comics and rule 34. They're not gonna match up. There should be no expectation that they would match up.

3HC-Hg-CH3 said:
Whether or not that will appease those wanting more canon personalities I don't know. But there shouldn't be any Borba-esque emotional manipulation or drama, just fetish sex.

Honestly, it feels to me like the "oh, it's one of THESE comics" people are not happy to dislike this story and want to label it this way so they can feel vindicated in not liking it or something along those lines. Much easier to knock it down a peg instead of walking away from it as-is.

AlbineFox said:
The fandom has been this way from the start. The ammount of butthurt in any fan work where Judy and Nick aren't together is gigantic

Nah, I wouldn't oversimplify this. There are other portrayals of these two characters that do fly well, like making them overall more dark (and the universe they're in equally so). And I've seen a few non-nick-and-judy pairings that go fine.

Qwazzy said:
I don't understand why an unusual representation can't be allowed to exist.

Absolutely, it can exist! Disdain for a comic is not a call for censorship, and downvotes are not a call for the tarring and feathering of the cartoonist.

Qwazzy said:
Much easier to knock it down a peg instead of walking away from it as-is.

Why should people walk away? Why should they not express an honest response? It would be strange of us to demand freedom for cartoonists, while at the same time, showing discomfort at the freedom of readers.

Ruinruined said:
Absolutely, it can exist! Disdain for a comic is not a call for censorship, and downvotes are not a call for the tarring and feathering of the cartoonist.

Some of these comments being made are very clearly saying, or implying, that they'd desire no further content of this nature being made anymore at all.

That's not far off from censorship.

Ruinruined said:
Why should people walk away? Why should they not express an honest response? It would be strange of us to demand freedom for cartoonists, while at the same time, showing discomfort at the freedom of readers.

Because this site has a blacklist.

Someone running into this kink for the first or second time can understandably not enjoy it and say so, but again, some of these comments make it obvious that they've made these same complaints on pretty much every single Nick and Judy fanwork that doesn't adhere to what they feel is the "proper" way to represent them. Especially where certain controversial kinks are involved, like cuckoldry.

They could easily use a line like "zootopia cuckolding" in their blacklist to avoid it, but they'd rather express their disdain instead, which is behaviour that is actively discouraged on this site.

Qwazzy said:

That's not far off from censorship.

Except, of course, for one missing detail: a means, a system, that would turn opinions into fandom-wide policies. How likely could such a thing be, in a fandom as divided and as lively in its arguments as this one?

Qwazzy said:

Someone running into this kink for the first or second time can understandably not enjoy it and say so, but again, some of these comments make it obvious that they've made these same complaints on pretty much every single Nick and Judy fanwork that doesn't adhere to what they feel is the "proper" way to represent them. Especially where certain controversial kinks are involved, like cuckoldry.

Again, I can't see the problem, here. Why shouldn't people complain? Is freedom only for cartoonists, and not for the readers, too?

Ruinruined said:
Except, of course, for one missing detail: a means, a system, that would turn opinions into fandom-wide policies. How likely could such a thing be, in a fandom as divided and as lively in its arguments as this one?

The intention having no method of creating such a policy does not make the intention acceptable.

Ruinruined said:
Again, I can't see the problem, here. Why shouldn't people complain? Is freedom only for cartoonists, and not for the readers, too?

Because this site encourages users to use the blacklist to avoid content they know they don't like, and many choose not to do this because they want to "leave their mark" on any content they don't enjoy.

Also, it isn't helping to pretend every criticism is all the same "freedom to complain" thing. There's more to this, mainly the "defense force" vibe of actively trying to discourage any content not fitting into their own belief of what the content should be, and insist that said content is objectively bad for not adhering to their standards. That markedly goes beyond a simple "I don't like this" statement. The artist has acknowledged this already, which says something about how this isn't a new issue, but a recurring one.

Qwazzy said:
The intention having no method of creating such a policy does not make the intention acceptable.

But it does make the intention harmless. (If the methods became possible, then I'd worry.)

Qwazzy said:

Because this site encourages users to use the blacklist to avoid content they know they don't like, and many choose not to do this because they want to "leave their mark" on any content they don't enjoy.

I'm afraid we're going around in circles, here, because you've not made clear to me why "leaving a mark" is wrong. Why not express displeasure? Why not say, "I dislike this?" Why not participate on a board set up for participation?

Sorry, I missed this part:

Qwazzy said:

Also, it isn't helping to pretend every criticism is all the same "freedom to complain" thing. There's more to this, mainly the "defense force" vibe of actively trying to discourage any content not fitting into their own belief of what the content should be, and insist that said content is objectively bad for not adhering to their standards. That markedly goes beyond a simple "I don't like this" statement. The artist has acknowledged this already, which says something about how this isn't a new issue, but a recurring one.

Again, I can't see any mechanism in place that would allow this to pose a danger within our fandom. Any cartoonist who feels strongly about a certain position will stick to it, and lack of popularity has never stopped anyone who works with conviction.

Ruinruined said:
But it does make the intention harmless. (If the methods became possible, then I'd worry.)

I'll leave it at that then, because at this point it's just a disagreement. I think it can be harmful, if only to the content creators who see this kind of reaction and feel discouraged to make something they'd like because of how others would react to it.

Ruinruined said:
I'm afraid we're going around in circles, here, because you've not made clear to me why "leaving a mark" is wrong. Why not express displeasure? Why not say, "I dislike this?" Why not participate on a board set up for participation?

That's not what this is about.
Sharing your opinion and having a discussion is okay.
"Making a mark" (in other words, going out of your way to downvote and criticize every work that goes into kinks/themes you don't like) is discouraged on e621.
I have no problem with the former, only the latter, so there's no need to keep looping back to the former like that. It's not what I'm talking about, and it's only serving to apparently confuse you over something I feel I'm being pretty clear about.

Qwazzy said:
I'll leave it at that then, because at this point it's just a disagreement.

Still, it led to a good discussion, and I'm grateful for it. I only regret that I've not quite understood your concern.

Lost a bit of respect there Judy.

Thank you for reminding me to add cucking to my blacklist :/

This isn't even cucking. Cucking implies the male is part of it, watching it and enjoying the show.

Judy here does stuff behind Nick's back with the pregnancy prevention, closes Nick out of the room, and she is obviously saying "luv u" to the other guy. This is just straight up cheating. All this because the artist has a twisted delusion what being a "strong independent woman" means. Judy is neither strong nor independent here, just a cheating bastard.

Thank god the real Nick and Judy are canonically described as both caring about the other and putting the other's happiness before their own. Judy Hopps will never betray Nick Wilde's trust like this.

Judy Whore and Cuck Wilde can do whatever the artists wants here because they are not the same characters

I like the ship like any other fan but God guys, it's just porn.
The artist can do whatever they want.

Meh.

Tom20 said:
I like the ship like any other fan but God guys, it's just porn.
The artist can do whatever they want.

I'll admit, I may not like what direction this comic is going, but the art style is really good, plus I can't change the artist mind, and I'm not gonna down vote because drawing things takes alot amount of time.
I don't want anyone to feel like they paint a picture then I just spit on it, regardless if we agree on different things.

OH SHIT, HE'S GOIN BORBA MODE!

You had me and you lost me.

can hares even breed with bunnies to begin with?

The kink-shaming in this site would be funny if it weren't stupid. You guys do realize you are FURRIES, rigth? Then why are you acting like some higher than thou normie that goes "Ewww, you're a creep if you like that" or "Disgusting furry". Hypocrisy at it's finest.
If you don't like a kink then use the blacklist, simple as that. And don't give that "Hur dur, but they are hurting mah favorite characters" cheap excuse. Everyone was okay with Borba's shitty characterization of them until the day he drew IWS. I've seen other comics where they are nothing like Nick and Judy and are very unlikeable to other characters get praised in this site.
Krystal in the Star Fox fandom gets portrayed as a loving and caring girlfriend/wife at times and as a slut at other times but I don't see a mob of fanboys forming to storm the comment sections of that fandom. Can't wait to be downvoted by a bunch of salty shippers with the maturity of 5YO cause they think that the world has to comform to them.

Moroze said:
Again, I'm just adverse to the drama this will cause. We've all been through Borba.

I still have zero reference to what that name pertains to. I'm guessing it's either an artist or commissioner that enjoys getting content of Nick and Judy acting in ways the others don't like. But that's just an educated guess on my part.

So far the rest of what I've been saying seems to be pretty accurate. I appreciated hearing Ruinruined's view on things, but it seems the others are content to simply downvote what they don't agree with.

I can settle for that, even if it isn't ideal. I don't worry about those numbers for the most part. To me, the downvote means "I don't like what you say, but I don't have a rebuttal". That's a win in my book. If I at least caused a couple people to think about it a little more, I'm happy.

"If you don't like the comic - please don't bother me with any comments or feedback that I'll just delete."

This seems a little discouraging.

I like how introducing an aspect of infidelity to anything that exists on this site is like setting off a bomb in the comments section. Literally nothing else gets this response, and it's kinda fascinating.

Felicity_Longis said:
I like how introducing an aspect of infidelity to anything that exists on this site is like setting off a bomb in the comments section. Literally nothing else gets this response, and it's kinda fascinating.

I've seen plenty of examples of images with infidelity that don't get negative responses, so I don't buy that the infidelity is the factor people are repulsed by.

AlbineFox said:
The kink-shaming in this site would be funny if it weren't stupid. You guys do realize you are FURRIES, rigth? Then why are you acting like some higher than thou normie that goes "Ewww, you're a creep if you like that" or "Disgusting furry". Hypocrisy at it's finest.
If you don't like a kink then use the blacklist, simple as that. And don't give that "Hur dur, but they are hurting mah favorite characters" cheap excuse. Everyone was okay with Borba's shitty characterization of them until the day he drew IWS. I've seen other comics where they are nothing like Nick and Judy and are very unlikeable to other characters get praised in this site.
Krystal in the Star Fox fandom gets portrayed as a loving and caring girlfriend/wife at times and as a slut at other times but I don't see a mob of fanboys forming to storm the comment sections of that fandom. Can't wait to be downvoted by a bunch of salty shippers with the maturity of 5YO cause they think that the world has to comform to them.

Oh hey, love the fanfics that you write, where you write Nick as a pedophile and a rapist to make Wildehopps non-canon, or the art that you draw, where you make Judy an incessant and depressed stalker of Nick while he is dating a vixen or someone else. It just goes to show how much you really care showing our beloved characters as who they are.

Oh and by the way, Borba has already been getting lots of criticism even before IWS, his characterization just showed its full unholy glory on that comic. And if the meaning 'furries' to you means someone who loves anthropomorphic animals but can step back, look at what's wrong at something, and have the guts to say it, then furries are so glad they're not you.

CodeOfJerrys said:
It just goes to show how much you really care showing our beloved characters as who they are.

Translation: "Nick and Judy have a canon personality and you can't change it!"

Which, by the way, is utter bullshit.

Yikes in the dislikes! :(

CodeOfJerrys said:
Oh hey, love the fanfics that you write, where you write Nick as a pedophile and a rapist to make Wildehopps non-canon, or the art that you draw, where you make Judy an incessant and depressed stalker of Nick while he is dating a vixen or someone else. It just goes to show how much you really care showing our beloved characters as who they are.

Oh and by the way, Borba has already been getting lots of criticism even before IWS, his characterization just showed its full unholy glory on that comic. And if the meaning 'furries' to you means someone who loves anthropomorphic animals but can step back, look at what's wrong at something, and have the guts to say it, then furries are so glad they're not you.

I find great that you read my fics and disliked them. I never thought I was good enough to have everyone like them and I never asked anyone to like my fanfics or my art, on the contrary, I asked that if you don't like it don't bother looking into it. That's common sense.

What you and the other shippers struggle to understand is that no one needs or wants thought police that go "we're totally not trying to censor, we're just better than you and you are wrong" all of the time.

Like I said, no one has to conform with what you like to see. Do you think I'm the only one that thinks you guys are annoying pricks? I talked to users that said they look the other way cause they don't want anyone in the fandom to exclude them.

And of course, anytime someone makes a characterization mistake but they check the "[X]Wildehopps" box then all complaints are automatically antishipper hate.

The reason we can be creative with stuff is that this is fanfiction/art. I don't have to worry about 100% of the audience liking my creation nor about profits. Like I said before, other communities have tons of stuff but the Zootopia community has this "If you don't follow the same plot everyone else does then we'll downvote/report/spam you until you leave"

CodeOfJerrys said:
can step back, look at what's wrong at something, and have the guts to say it

Oh fuck off. You're not stunning and brave just cause you anonymously gave your opinion on the internet.

Most of you motherfuckers uses a different nickname in each website you go to.
I always use the same so people can know that if they dislike me in one website they can avoid interacting with me elsewhere. You haven't addressed my points in your comment, you just used ad hominem and proved me right.

RubisDrake said:
Having a comments section and rating system was never a good idea. }3

I like to think that the general positive and appreciative comments seen on images on this site outweigh the occasional comments snarl. It's hardly like people are posting fluffy bunnies and getting 'Kill urself' in response.

The reaction here just strikes me as a bit hasty. It's one comic, that is done. There likely won't be more for a year or two, possibly ever. Maybe you like it, maybe you don't. That's only really deserving of a single post, 'Yay great' or 'No thanks.' There's no need for us to get upset, especially at non-comic things like the comments section.

Now let's all go have a bowl of strawberry icecream. Nothing soothes the soul like strawberry icecream!

3HC-Hg-CH3 said:

Now let's all go have a bowl of strawberry icecream. Nothing soothes the soul like strawberry icecream!

It won't remove the bitter taste of your condescension.

Remember kids! If you can't think of a plot for your Zootopia comic, just have it involve Nick getting cucked and/or being horribly written

Spoonman said:
I've seen plenty of examples of images with infidelity that don't get negative responses, so I don't buy that the infidelity is the factor people are repulsed by.

Well, whatever it is, it sure as shit isn't worth the fuss. I mean, shouldn't we be saving our collective outrage for the next Zaush comic or something?

It’s honestly quite interesting to see how people react to comics such as this.

I absolutely love this, though if I were Nick and found out Judy just wanted to keep banging that other bunny I wouldn't stop her at all really

H2O2 said:
Guys im apparently super out of the loop. I have no idea what going borba means can someone please explain it to me O_O

Preserve your innocence, and thrive. Life is too short for Borbas.

H2O2 said:
Guys im apparently super out of the loop. I have no idea what going borba means can someone please explain it to me O_O

Borba refers to artist that made a troll comic.

ymirTheTusk said:
A bunch of furry losers go to pics and comics they hate the subject of and complain.

By the same token, Ymir, do you complain about comments on a comment board? :D

There's just no way this ends well. Either Nick finds out and leaves her, at which point he'll be painted as the bad guy as per that Borba comic, or he finds out and doesn't complain, which makes him the ultimate doormat. I supposed that's par for the course in a cuckoldry comic.

Or he just laughs when she admits it. It's all in fun, after all.

This can't be Borba. The lines aren't as crisp and the colors are less lush. And it's not dripping with Catholic ideology. It's just an average bad comic. It doesn't even rise to the level of terribad titan like Mystic Tantra.

Felicity_Longis said:
Well, whatever it is, it sure as shit isn't worth the fuss. I mean, shouldn't we be saving our collective outrage for the next Zaush comic or something?

Are you trying to tell me there's an upper limit to the outrage available around here?

Also, I really don't get why people are having a hard time understanding that totally changing the characters in a fandom would make people in the fandom upset. I mean, everyone is allowed to have alternate character interpretations, but the idea there is to cast a character in a better or worse light based on how you could rationalize their actions. MAYBE Nick would freely share his bunny because his whole life has been built around protecting himself from emotional pain and so treating judy like a fucksleeve to be passed around and convincing himself he doesn't have a strong emotional connection makes him feel better. Maybe Judy needs a ton of D because of rabbit mating drive and Nick just can't provide enough. You could make that work. But randomly assassinating the OTP without proper characterization is going to catch a lot of shade.

SleepingGiant said:
Are you trying to tell me there's an upper limit to the outrage available around here?

Also, I really don't get why people are having a hard time understanding that totally changing the characters in a fandom would make people in the fandom upset. I mean, everyone is allowed to have alternate character interpretations, but the idea there is to cast a character in a better or worse light based on how you could rationalize their actions. MAYBE Nick would freely share his bunny because his whole life has been built around protecting himself from emotional pain and so treating judy like a fucksleeve to be passed around and convincing himself he doesn't have a strong emotional connection makes him feel better. Maybe Judy needs a ton of D because of rabbit mating drive and Nick just can't provide enough. You could make that work. But randomly assassinating the OTP without proper characterization is going to catch a lot of shade.

This falls under the same category as "Hey, why are there physical and cultural ramifications to things I said and did?" You speech is free (limited by practical reality; no matter how much you whine you do not have free speech in areas expressly controlled by me or by some other entity; I can demand you leave my home and failure to comply can go from jail time to you getting stand-your-ground'd) but the consequences are just as free. People will react as they want. That's the reality.

Oh boy a new Adam Wan comic for me to not like! Can we give this rabbit a name so I can blacklist him?

SleepingGiant said:
Are you trying to tell me there's an upper limit to the outrage available around here?

Well, you went out of your way to find a week old comment voted below threshold, then wrote a small essay, so clearly there isn't.

Necrophilic said:
Oh boy a new Adam Wan comic for me to not like!

Wat?

First i like to share my emotional reaction to this comic and then rationalize over it to try identify the reason for all this controversy and rage:

While reading this comic I had the confusest boner ever, I find myself empathizing with nick and judy in finding cuckolding very hot (means the author archived his objective of arousing with this kink). But it causes me conflict as I often portrait me and my wife as nick and judy in canon and non-canon material even when I don't want to or shouldn't do. Interestingly enough I find a similar sensation to when in was young and had my first porn experience, that sensation of curiosity, morbidity, "liking something you are not suppose to, or it's seen as bad or dirty". I would never do something like this to my wife it would shatter our relationship and respect and love, never the less fantasizing about it gets me hard rock.

In my point of view empathy its what make people dislike works like this, they get forced to feel what they don't want to -and could stop reading, but continue out of morbidity i guess- so they feel detachment and cognitive dissonance trying to protect the ship that the community strongly builds and sails.

I want more comics like this, they are arousing even if it feels wrong or because it feels wrong. But in my mind I put them aside the main fannon that I like and support along sides SavageHopps, Borba and Mystic Tantra. Thats the beauty of all this being fantasy: I get to choose what to keep.

The thing that feel the worst about this comic it's that they seem to don't want children anymore, bringing offspring to the world is and act of love, between the couple and the child. But turning instead to a sexual fixation makes me feel like they don't love each other any more, unlike the Jay Naylor cuckold that keep a warm sensation between the cuckolded couple.

sukn said:

First i like to share my emotional reaction to this comic and then rationalize over it to try identify the reason for all this controversy and rage:

While reading this comic I had the confusest boner ever, I find myself empathizing with nick and judy in finding cuckolding very hot (means the author archived his objective of arousing with this kink). But it causes me conflict as I often portrait me and my wife as nick and judy in canon and non-canon material even when I don't want to or shouldn't do. Interestingly enough I find a similar sensation to when in was young and had my first porn experience, that sensation of curiosity, morbidity, "liking something you are not suppose to, or it's seen as bad or dirty". I would never do something like this to my wife it would shatter our relationship and respect and love, never the less fantasizing about it gets me hard rock.

In my point of view empathy its what make people dislike works like this, they get forced to feel what they don't want to -and could stop reading, but continue out of morbidity i guess- so they feel detachment and cognitive dissonance trying to protect the ship that the community strongly builds and sails.

I want more comics like this, they are arousing even if it feels wrong or because it feels wrong. But in my mind I put them aside the main fannon that I like and support along sides SavageHopps, Borba and Mystic Tantra. Thats the beauty of all this being fantasy: I get to choose what to keep.

The thing that feel the worst about this comic it's that they seem to don't want children anymore, bringing offspring to the world is and act of love, between the couple and the child. But turning instead to a sexual fixation makes me feel like they don't love each other any more, unlike the Jay Naylor cuckold that keep a warm sensation between the cuckolded couple.

Following up to this seemingly loveless relation, I may fix it with a head-canon follow up on this comic, I hate myself a little for doing this but gotta get it out my mind -WARNING: more cuckold and other kinks-:

I have more(pregnant fucking, escalation, breast-feeding, fucking bunny-ragdoll, more escalation) but it's late and i'm tired

As promised here is the rest: https://archiveofourown.org/works/20428739/chapters/48463943

CCoyote said:
Buncha y'all need to learn how to use your blacklist and quit whining.

Notice how if it's popular and someone complains, they get slapped by a mod and told to learn how to blacklist, but if it's unpopular and people won't fuck off and you tell them to blacklist, they just downvote?

Ruinruined said:
Still, it led to a good discussion, and I'm grateful for it. I only regret that I've not quite understood your concern.

No, it didn't really. Just more whinging.

Embracethechaos said:
Remember kids! If you can't think of a plot for your Zootopia comic, just have it involve Nick getting cucked and/or being horribly written

Remember kids! If someone writes your characters how you don't like be sure to bitch and whine and throw an endless fit on the internet to try to discourage it!

Reptard said:
Remember kids! If someone writes your characters how you don't like be sure to bitch and whine and throw an endless fit on the internet to try to discourage it!

Shipping in a nutshell

Reptard said:
Notice how if it's popular and someone complains, they get slapped by a mod and told to learn how to blacklist, but if it's unpopular and people won't fuck off and you tell them to blacklist, they just downvote?

Too little mods available sadly, also some mods are questionable at times

Wow, there are A LOT of controversial Zootopia comics.

3hc-hg-ch3 said:
I like to think that the general positive and appreciative comments seen on images on this site outweigh the occasional comments snarl. It's hardly like people are posting fluffy bunnies and getting 'Kill urself' in response.

The reaction here just strikes me as a bit hasty. It's one comic, that is done. There likely won't be more for a year or two, possibly ever. Maybe you like it, maybe you don't. That's only really deserving of a single post, 'Yay great' or 'No thanks.' There's no need for us to get upset, especially at non-comic things like the comments section.

Now let's all go have a bowl of strawberry icecream. Nothing soothes the soul like strawberry icecream!

I tend to like you so I like to do the kid gloves thing.

The comment did not reach expectations and I'm terribly sorry. It had a sequel.

ruinruined said:
Except, of course, for one missing detail: a means, a system, that would turn opinions into fandom-wide policies. How likely could such a thing be, in a fandom as divided and as lively in its arguments as this one?

Again, I can't see the problem, here. Why shouldn't people complain? Is freedom only for cartoonists, and not for the readers, too?

Because there's a blacklist, if you can't say anything positive don't say anything at all

embracethechaos said:
Remember kids! If you can't think of a plot for your Zootopia comic, just have it involve Nick getting cucked and/or being horribly written

Remember kids, if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all. Thank you

daddydraco said:
Because there's a blacklist, if you can't say anything positive don't say anything at all

That's not how criticism/opinions works. Hell, you might as well say "I don't like other's opinions so shut up."

ernestoroo said:
Sly bunny.

dumb fox?

She for the streets nick