Aliasing facial -> facial_cumshot.

Reason: Wiki for facial says "Images or animations depicting a male character ejaculating onto the face of another character at the moment of orgasm." Is that not what a facial cumshot is?
Most of the posts in facial seems to be facial cumshots as well. There is one post with a character peeing onto another's face in there, but that can be changed to peeing_on_face.

Also, there appears to have been discussion about this a while ago (forum #466). After reading this, I believe cum_on_face should be unaliased from facial_cumshot, and imply facial_cumshot -> cum_on_face.

Do we really need to have "cumshot" in there? I'm sure most people on this site know what "facial" means, so it seems a little uneccessary.

I think cum_on_face works just fine, and should have facial and facial_cumshot aliased to it. And it fits the pattern of cum_on_ass, cum_on_pussy, cum_on_breasts...

tony311 said:
I think cum_on_face works just fine, and should have facial and facial_cumshot aliased to it. And it fits the pattern of cum_on_ass, cum_on_pussy, cum_on_breasts...

Having cum on your face, and having some guy shoot their load all over your face, are not the same thing. The second implies the first, which is why an implication should be used.

Ultima_Weapon said:
Do we really need to have "cumshot" in there? I'm sure most people on this site know what "facial" means, so it seems a little uneccessary.

Clearly we do, if you're getting a character's face being pissed on being tagged as facial.
Wikis, who reads them? :V

I'm pretty sure that face pissing shouldn't be labeled as a "facial", but only as watersports.

Riversyde said:
Having cum on your face, and having some guy shoot their load all over your face, are not the same thing. The second implies the first, which is why an implication should be used.

Isn't it under "ejaculation" when you have a guy in the process of cumming, and the various cum tags for when there's cum on someone?

Ultima_Weapon said:
Isn't it under "ejaculation" when you have a guy in the process of cumming, and the various cum tags for when there's cum on someone?

You know. That is right.

Actually... here, cum gets two meanings. Means semen, or cumming on something. The cum on butt, pussy, breasts etc. tags are indistinguishable from each of the meanings.

So! I propose we change the cum_on_* tags on posts that feature a character actually cumming ON someone to cumshot_on_*. This will just add to this discussion about cum and cumshots, but getting tags cleaned up is why I started this topic.

Also, I now realise you can have the point inbetween the cumshot and the cum hitting them. Welp, that means no more implication.

Change the tags to "cumshot_on_*? Cum_on_* better alias to that because i'm to lazy to remember to type those extra 4 letters.

Ultima_Weapon said:
Change the tags to "cumshot_on_*? Cum_on_* better alias to that because i'm to lazy to remember to type those extra 4 letters.

An alias is not what I mean. cumshot_on_* would have to imply cum_on_*, because if you cum on someone's face, they do have cum on their face. The two tags need to be distinguishable from each other. If you get the point after you cum, but before their (x) gets hit with your cum, that would be cumshot_towards_(x).

so.. cumshot_towards_* cumshot_on_* and cum_on_*? that seems ... convoluted c_c;

SnowWolf said:
so.. cumshot_towards_* cumshot_on_* and cum_on_*? that seems ... convoluted c_c;

That's why we have the wiki, innit? :P
We should seperate the a character cumming on something from the cum_on_* tag, because the tag having two different meanings isn't good.
And then you could have when a character is cumming towards another's face, but the cum has not hit their face yet. That's what the cumshot_towards_* is for.

Of course, if anyone has a better solution which covers all these aspects, go ahead.

You know what. Forget the cumshot_towards_* tags. That can be covered by cumshot.

So, after fighting with myself in the post box for about half an hour now... I believe I may have come to an easy solution. cum_on_(x) and cumshot can be combined to search for a character's (x) being cummed on.

So here the changes I'm suggesting.
alias facial -> facial_cumshot
imply facial_cumshot -> cum_on_face
imply facial_cumshot -> cumshot

Riversyde said:
You know what. Forget the cumshot_towards_* tags. That can be covered by cumshot.

So, after fighting with myself in the post box for about half an hour now...

Doing that is so much fun, isn't it? XD

I believe I may have come to an easy solution. cum_on_(x) and cumshot can be combined to search for a character's (x) being cummed on.

So here the changes I'm suggesting.
alias facial -> facial_cumshot
imply facial_cumshot -> cum_on_face
imply facial_cumshot -> cumshot

I think I agree with these ideas :D

SnowWolf said:
Doing that is so much fun, isn't it? XD

It's TURRIBLE.

I'd say alias facial_cumshot to cumshot, tbh. if you want a facial cumshot, cumshot + cum_on_face. We don't need a specific section for facial cumshots specifically separate from cumshots when that search combo would be fine.

123easy said:
I'd say alias facial_cumshot to cumshot, tbh. if you want a facial cumshot, cumshot + cum_on_face. We don't need a specific section for facial cumshots specifically separate from cumshots when that search combo would be fine.

thisis also a decent idea...

facial aliases to cum_on_face
facial_cumshot aliases to cum_on_face

ah.. though that's the catch with that. You can only alias a phrase to one thing, so you'd have to give up 'cumshot'...

No, I think River has it best...

Why would there have to be any giving up of 'cumshot'? I was talking about search tags- cumshot and cum_on_face. For alias, keep it to cumshot. Go through the facial pics beforehand and add cum_on_face for the applicable ones, or cumshot, whichever facial/facial_cumshot doesn't get aliased to.

Then we would have to keep going through and adding cum_on_face to the facial_cumshot pics that wouldn't get tagged with it. Implications are better, for what we have to work with.

Ahh, I see. That makes good enough sense.