On our journey through E621 we’ve all seen some interesting pieces of art and wiki’s relating to some [insert adjective] tags. So, from your own experience what wiki would you consider to be of the previous elaborations?

post #35962
is the only image with the tag that_one_guy

integillent_guy said:
post #35962
is the only image with the tag that_one_guy

That seems like a useless tag, not sure why it's even still around.

that_one_bug_that_looks_like_a_croissant_that_you_can_freeze_and_use_as_a_platform is a more entertaining tag.
post #69497

furrin_gok said:
that_one_bug_that_looks_like_a_croissant_that_you_can_freeze_and_use_as_a_platform is a more entertaining tag.
post #69497

I was going to mention that one. There's also those_chocolates_where_everyone_always_eats_the_orange_cremes_before_you_get_any_and_all_you_get_is_the_coconut, which only seems to be present on two posts but the tag name makes me laugh.

There's some... "interesting" ones if you search the tags list for varying lengths of "*_*_*_*_*", specifically the General tags. Several of which I highly doubt should be tags, such as "this_super_random_flying_dick_thing_that_exists", "resembles_but_is_legally_distinct_from_a_vaporeon", or "why_put_a_bed_in_a_place_with_no_ceiling".

Since wikis were asked about, too, there's some pretty ridiculous lines in some of the really basic/common tag wikis. Such as reading, book, clothing, or human.

hyper_cum before I edited it.

While it's wiki is fairly short and to the point, I think the weaponized_breasts tag fits all three categories splendidly: obscure, interesting, and ridiculous.

I'm rather surprised this tag only has a few dozen posts.