Acceptable.

Edit: Feel free to put me down as a translator for Gaelic and a bit of Japanese for users who don't understand English very well.

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Changed discinplinary action "Warning" to be a negative record instead of neutral

So now all warnings are red marks and not gray? Than what is the point of gray marks falling off after 6 months? is it just because there will only be red in the future?

Conker said:
So now all warnings are red marks and not gray? Than what is the point of gray marks falling off after 6 months? is it just because there will only be red in the future?

No, a grey notification is the first thing, a happy reminder to please stop that, a red warning is the second thing, a not so happy reminder that this is against the rules, then a short, red suspension to make them read the rules and finally a red ban to tell them to kindly fuck off.

That is also basically how it was always done, it was just not written like that in the old CoC, compare "Disciplinary Actions" now and then.

NotMeNotYou said:
No, a grey notification is the first thing, a happy reminder to please stop that, a red warning is the second thing, a not so happy reminder that this is against the rules, then a short, red suspension to make them read the rules and finally a red ban to tell them to kindly fuck off.

That is also basically how it was always done, it was just not written like that in the old CoC, compare "Disciplinary Actions" now and then.

Ah, the wording there me off a little. I hope what you say is true, if so thanks for clearing it up

I went from a money donating whore to a lurker after (now ex)mods like Riverysde were allowed to promote trolling and rule-breaking. So at least I have no more stress.

akw_kovu said:
I went from a money donating whore to a lurker after (now ex)mods like Riverysde were allowed to promote trolling and rule-breaking. So at least I have no more stress.

I'm curious as to how he "promoted trolling and rule breaking."

ippiki_ookami said:
I'm curious as to how he "promoted trolling and rule breaking."

I have a guess.

akw kovu Riversyde 2 years ago

Blocked: Don't flag things for deletion because you don't like them.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
I have a guess.

How odd, that was going to be my guess too~

akw_kovu said:
I went from a money donating whore to a lurker after (now ex)mods like Riverysde were allowed to promote trolling and rule-breaking. So at least I have no more stress.

Riversyde never promoted trolling and rulebreaking. He was a pretty damn good admin.

Patchi said:
Riversyde never promoted trolling and rulebreaking. He was a pretty damn good admin.

Ehhhhh.... River caused the big > huge > hyper implication trainwreck. Never forget >.>

River was the first admin to lock one of my threads when I was new. Ah, good times

I'm curious, what is the origin of the no Role-Play rule? I have never partaken in it myself, but I've seen it on other forums and it didn't seem offensive?

Daggett said:
I'm curious, what is the origin of the no Role-Play rule? I have never partaken in it myself, but I've seen it on other forums and it didn't seem offensive?

Given the nature of the site, role-players tend to make it erotic ("I want to [action] inside [character's bodypart or hole] really hard" or something along those lines)

Daggett said:
I'm curious, what is the origin of the no Role-Play rule? I have never partaken in it myself, but I've seen it on other forums and it didn't seem offensive?

Give somebody the power to RP and they do the most creepy things they can where everybody can see. RP is allowed in non-public places like DMail

Daggett said:
I'm curious, what is the origin of the no Role-Play rule? I have never partaken in it myself, but I've seen it on other forums and it didn't seem offensive?

Ya, before that rule it got pretty gross here. So it was for people's sanity and to not creep out artists to the DNP list

Seven_Twenty said:
Give somebody the power to RP and they do the most creepy things they can where everybody can see. RP is allowed in non-public places like DMail

Wait a sec, I saw a ticket recently that says that there is a rp exception of a one-off post intended for humor. https://e621.net/tickets/show/8175

Why do we have this sudden change? Shouldnt we keep to "no rp posts" at all so no one is confused thinking its alright to make them? I just dont see why we have this exception for rp posts. Could someone explain?

Conker said:
Wait a sec, I saw a ticket recently that says that there is a rp exception of a one-off post intended for humor. https://e621.net/tickets/show/8175

Why do we have this sudden change? Shouldnt we keep to "no rp posts" at all so no one is confused thinking its alright to make them? I just dont see why we have this exception for rp posts. Could someone explain?

Conker said:
[...]exception of a one-off post intended for humor.

Gee, I wonder why...

CoC on the first page in this thread says:
Role-Play
Suggested Suspension Length: 3 days
This category includes:

• Initiating or partaking in explicit role-play of any type
• Impersonating fictional/nonfictional characters or people
• Initiating or partaking in role-play with characters in the related thread/post

This is intended to prevent a culture that is inherently self-destructive and takes away from the website. There are acceptable forms of role-play, typically that which reinforces a point, creates humor, or otherwise does not cause a disruption. Even in this setting, however, role-play must be just a single comment, and cannot be made in response to another role-player.

That is simply so that the occasional "'Oh boy, I baked you a pie!' 'What flavor?' 'Pie flavor'" isn't criminalized.

NotMeNotYou said:
That is simply so that the occasional "'Oh boy, I baked you a pie!' 'What flavor?' 'Pie flavor'" isn't criminalized.

I'm going to punch your face... IN THE FACE!

Arcturus said:
I'm going to punch your face... IN THE FACE!

Arcturus, go back to bed. You are drunk.

Daggett said:
I'm curious, what is the origin of the no Role-Play rule? I have never partaken in it myself, but I've seen it on other forums and it didn't seem offensive?

My guess is that posts like post #162094 did it. I'm pretty sure that not that long ago not excessive role play was okay (forum #21857). I wouldn't be surprised that reason of change were bronies. :/

Patchi said:
Arcturus, go back to bed. You are drunk.

~🍊~

Arcturus said:
~~

01F
34R

Wat? I must be missing a char file on this pc, as I dont know what is :V

Conker said:
01F
34R

Wat? I must be missing a char file on this pc, as I dont know what is :V

Go DL some font packs, mebbe? It shows as a.... wedge of a citrus fruit?... to me.

I'm more astonished that Arcturus is still around. :o

123easy said:
Go DL some font packs, mebbe? It shows as a.... wedge of a citrus fruit?... to me

I did get a ton of font packs, not sure which ones im missing.

Conker said:
I did get a ton of font packs, not sure which ones im missing.

Hmm... I dunno either. I checked all my *dings fonts, and others that seemed it could have been, and I don't see the character in there.

Arcturus said:
I'm going to punch your face... IN THE FACE!

Heh heh

Arcturus said:
~~

Arc NO CREEPY FACE.

Patchi said:
Arc NO CREEPY FACE.

It's not a creepy face... it's a citrus fruit wedge. ._. Like, draw the bottom half of a circle, then a slightly smaller one inside that about two pixels out, then draw four lines radiating out from where the center of the circle would be to cut up the space inside the second line into equal wedges.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
My guess is that posts like post #162094 did it. I'm pretty sure that not that long ago not excessive role play was okay (forum #21857). I wouldn't be surprised that reason of change were bronies. :/

Well there was a rising of people naming themselves show characters (*cough*) a while back.

I think a lot of it came from brony roleplayers commenting on porn pics "they" were in. Like Twilight Sparkle (the user) RPing being all flustered from a explicit pic of her. That and the surplus of "royal guards" that started getting crazy with violent aggressive RP when bad things happened to ponies.

There was a post on it when it first came in (Ippikki I think) but my half ass search did not find it

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
My guess is that posts like post #162094 did it. I'm pretty sure that not that long ago not excessive role play was okay (forum #21857). I wouldn't be surprised that reason of change were bronies. :/

Yeah, I see what you mean, thanks.

Ahhh... the new update (a little late w/ that) I cannot find all the tags, whats up with that?

Exterp said:
Ahhh... the new update (a little late w/ that) I cannot find all the tags, whats up with that?

What tags?

NotMeNotYou said:
What tags?

I'm guessing he means the Trending tags when you search something

Mexican isn't a language.
It's still Spanish.
It could be considered a dialect in comparison to Spain's Spanish...
But that's like saying Ebonics, Southern, and Cockney are a different language than English.

Moon_Moon said:
Mexican isn't a language.
It's still Spanish.
It could be considered a dialect in comparison to Spain's Spanish...
But that's like saying Ebonics, Southern, and Cockney are a different language than English.

It's a variation of Spanish with many accents (northern, southern, "chilango" etc etc, depends on the city and part of it, too many to count)

If you mean what I understand, then "Spanish/Mexican" should be changed to "Spanish (Mexico)"

Example: I heard EDFDarkAngel1 lives in Phoenix (okay) I heard that EDFDarkAngel1 drives a red 1961 Ferrari GT California (not okay)

i dont see a huge issue with naming a car, i mean, its a nice car. i'd tell everyone if i had it. a better example would be, listing a home address, or college they attend currently

Even if another site has the same character with better visibility of its gender, that post uniquely must contain those elements

how does this apply to comics? I'm thinking of a scenerio where a user has "shemale" black-listed, and the first 5 pages show no indication, then the user presses "next in pool" button, and BAM.
since it's one comic, can we assume its one long artwork?
or better yet, is there a way to tag a pool itself so users know all the content within it?

The intent is to prevent anyone’s sexual orientation from being the target of malice, harassment, etc. Example: I picked up a fag from the ground (okay). Then I dropped him back down again (not okay)

...what i love about this site, even when serious, you find time to slip in a few jokes. keep being awesome guys

nme22 said:
how does this apply to comics? I'm thinking of a scenerio where a user has "shemale" black-listed, and the first 5 pages show no indication, then the user presses "next in pool" button, and BAM.
since it's one comic, can we assume its one long artwork?
or better yet, is there a way to tag a pool itself so users know all the content within it?

IMO tagging comics is one of the most confusing things on the site. Comic on one picture is tagged differently then the same comic split on many pictures.
There are no pool tags that would apply TWYS in context of whole comic, and IMO this idea need to be implemented. Not only because of blacklist reasons, but also to search for, for example, all mlp comic. Or all digimon comic. Current pooling system is not working well for that many pools.

BTW, I'm still not sure how to tag quantity tags (solo, duo, group) on single pic comic when there are different number of characters on different panels.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
IMO tagging comics is one of the most confusing things on the site. Comic on one picture is tagged differently then the same comic split on many pictures.
There are no pool tags that would apply TWYS in context of whole comic, and IMO this idea need to be implemented. Not only because of blacklist reasons, but also to search for, for example, all mlp comic. Or all digimon comic. Current pooling system is not working well for that many pools.

BTW, I'm still not sure how to tag quantity tags (solo, duo, group) on single pic comic when there are different number of characters on different panels.

well, i'd imagine just the max number of characters in any one panel. i mean if the "comic" showed girls in different positions, but only one per panel (i.e. not interacting with each other) someone searching "solo" would be interested. if someone only wanted couples (duo) a comic may mainly focus at one couple at a time. therefore it should be tagged solo, and duo if there are panels with only one person. someone searching "solo -duo -group" would find what they want

nme22 said:
i dont see a huge issue with naming a car, i mean, its a nice car. i'd tell everyone if i had it. a better example would be, listing a home address, or college they attend currently

how does this apply to comics? I'm thinking of a scenerio where a user has "shemale" black-listed, and the first 5 pages show no indication, then the user presses "next in pool" button, and BAM.
since it's one comic, can we assume its one long artwork?
or better yet, is there a way to tag a pool itself so users know all the content within it?

...what i love about this site, even when serious, you find time to slip in a few jokes. keep being awesome guys

Comic tagging is a pain in the ass, but TWYS still applies. However, if they grouped in a Set, then it's a little different in the sense that if one of the pictures, it's not entirely clear if the character is a male, female, or something else, you can refer to other images IN THAT SET to determine the appropriate tag.

As for naming a car, it's meant to emphasize that we don't want anyone's personal information being broadcast without their permission. Even if it's not true (like I'm not Ferris Bueller), it's still not cool to talk about someone's personal property or personal information. While you would be cool telling everyone that you have a badass car (as would many people), if some guy you didn't know started mentioning it to people, and used it to start talking about the store you shop at, place you work, etc., it gets really weird, really fast.

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Comic tagging is a pain in the ass, but TWYS still applies. However, if they grouped in a Set, then it's a little different in the sense that if one of the pictures, it's not entirely clear if the character is a male, female, or something else, you can refer to other images IN THAT SET to determine the appropriate tag.

1. I hope that you mean pools not sets. Sets are more like extended personal favorites. If someone adds male character to his "my fav females" set it shouldn't magically change his gender. Pools are more "official".
2. Is this official (that is, other admins agree) that context of TWYS is entire pool? Don't get me wrong - I don't think that it must be a bad idea, but I'm pretty sure that up to now TWYS context in tagging genders was only one picture.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
2. Is this official (that is, other admins agree) that context of TWYS is entire pool? Don't get me wrong - I don't think that it must be a bad idea, but I'm pretty sure that up to now TWYS context in tagging genders was only one picture.

I don't agree with this at all. Just because an image happens to be in a pool shouldnt make it exempt from twys. Other images in the pool is still outside information.

ippiki_ookami said:
I don't agree with this at all. Just because an image happens to be in a pool shouldnt make it exempt from twys. Other images in the pool is still outside information.

Agreed, other images in pools are still outside info and should not break tag what you see.

Yeah, I concur. And it sounds like more trouble than it's worth.
Tag what you see, except <insert multiple clauses here>? Wouldn't it be better to keep the rules simple and easy to follow?

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Comic tagging is a pain in the ass, but TWYS still applies. However, if they grouped in a Set, then it's a little different in the sense that if one of the pictures, it's not entirely clear if the character is a male, female, or something else, you can refer to other images IN THAT SET to determine the appropriate tag.

Makes sense, But there should be some way of tagging a "pool". A situation comes to mind. Hypothetically,
Let's say there was a comic with 2 lesbians, and halfway through, one shits on the other.
I have "scat" blacklisted, but since it doesn't appear in the first part, i'd click on the first image, and start hitting that "next" arrow, until its ruined halfway through.

is there a way to add a section that says "pool tags" that alerts you to impending blacklisted tags?
or even just a feature that won't load a blacklisted image, unless you press a "show anyway" button?

ippiki_ookami said:
I don't agree with this at all. Just because an image happens to be in a pool shouldnt make it exempt from twys. Other images in the pool is still outside information.

But if it's all one comic, i think its safe to assume, if you see a character on page 1 nude, then on page 2 he/she is only shown from the neck up, that the gender hasn't changed, unless its a MTF comic, or somethin.

nme22 said:

But if it's all one comic, i think its safe to assume, if you see a character on page 1 nude, then on page 2 he/she is only shown from the neck up, that the gender hasn't changed, unless its a MTF comic, or somethin.

Thats not how tag what you see works. I dont need to see pictures of a female when I search dickgirl just because its tagged as dickgirl when it shows a female in the pic. Same for everything else, without tag what you see all the search results would be broken for tags. I dont care if its in the same comic or pool, in that image there is no dickgirl and a female so we tag what we see not what we know.

Conker said:
Thats not how tag what you see works. I dont need to see pictures of a female when I search dickgirl just because its tagged as dickgirl when it shows a female in the pic. Same for everything else, without tag what you see all the search results would be broken for tags. I dont care if its in the same comic or pool, in that image there is no dickgirl and a female so we tag what we see not what we know.

but what if it's a "trap" comic? in your situation, yea, if it looks like a girl, you may not wanna see it, you'd only want to see the next page where s/he lifts hir skirt (or whatever the politically correct term is.), BUT in another situation, I have Dickgirl blacklisted (not really, being hypothetical) , i search female, see her about to lift her skirt, and next page surprise penis ruins my day, despite my blacklist, because i click "next"

nme22 said:
but what if it's a "trap" comic? in your situation, yea, if it looks like a girl, you may not wanna see it, you'd only want to see the next page where s/he lifts hir skirt (or whatever the politically correct term is.), BUT in another situation, I have Dickgirl blacklisted (not really, being hypothetical) , i search female, see her about to lift her skirt, and next page surprise penis ruins my day, despite my blacklist, because i click "next"

Dont care, tag what you see. I dont care if it has a dick within the next 5 pages of some comic, we tag what we see on that image not the rest. If not when searching up a tag we end up seeing something else not in that image, Tag what you see, is the best rule on this site as it keeps you from seeing shit you dont like to see.

As you said you dont like dickgirls? Well when you search female you will see images of females, as they are seen and tagged. Since you have the next bit blacklisted you wont see it anyway. We should not ruin tags just because you think we should tag things not in the image. Simple as that.

if you're that worried about a trap in a comic you can always search the pool, and add or subtract tags to see if there's pages in the comic that have stuff you don't like.

Until pool tagging is implemented that's the best option.

ippiki_ookami said:
I don't agree with this at all. Just because an image happens to be in a pool shouldnt make it exempt from twys. Other images in the pool is still outside information.

I agree, but in the same breath we need pool tagging so we can tag a pool under a certain classification (so individual images can be examined out of context, while the entire pool can be).

I suggested pool tags on feature request few months ago. The one thing that bugs me about e621 is that on feature request thread there is rarely any feedback so I don't know whether:
a) Admins think it's good idea, and it may be implemented in future.
b) Admins think it sucks or/and it's too hard to implement.
c) Everyone was too busy at that time to even look at that thread.

I doubt that there's a quick and easy way to add pool tagging, that being said I would like to add all of my vote in favor of it.
Tagging single images based on other images in the pool is horrible, but the ability to see all the appropriate content tags for a comic at once is extremely useful.

Halite said:
I doubt that there's a quick and easy way to add pool tagging, that being said I would like to add all of my vote in favor of it.
Tagging single images based on other images in the pool is horrible, but the ability to see all the appropriate content tags for a comic at once is extremely useful.

well, i'd imagine "pool-tagging" would be automatic. if the images in a pool are tagged
male,solo,fox,
and
female,male,duo,feline,fox,kiss
then it would automatically be tagged
male female solo duo feline fox kiss,
and so a post would have an extra side-bar labeled "pool tags" in addition to it's regular "Tags" section
then an image would have a boarder on it's thumb-nail if its in a pool with black-listed posts...

of course all of this seems very convoluted at this point... I think the other idea would be simpler. just don't display an image, on it's page if it's blacklisted, and provide a "show anyway" button. no chance of running into stuff you don't want from pools, or links.

Conker said:
Dont care, tag what you see. I dont care if it has a dick within the next 5 pages of some comic, we tag what we see on that image not the rest. If not when searching up a tag we end up seeing something else not in that image, Tag what you see, is the best rule on this site as it keeps you from seeing shit you dont like to see.

As you said you dont like dickgirls? Well when you search female you will see images of females, as they are seen and tagged. Since you have the next bit blacklisted you wont see it anyway. We should not ruin tags just because you think we should tag things not in the image. Simple as that.

I don't mean putting a "dick" tag on an image with a lone nude woman that has a naked guy appearing 5 pages later. i mean, if you see a character with breasts, and a skirt, you'd probably tag it "female", but if the next page of that comic reveals that the "female" is actually a "shemale", the first page should be "shemale".

unless they are fully nude, we make assumptions of genders, because parts are hidden. all we see are breasts, there is no way to tell if there is a vagina, or penis under that skirt.

No go on that nme. That's exactly what TWYS DOES NOT allow. We've had massive arguments over this as a community- We do NOT allow outside information EXCEPT for character names and artists, for obvious reasons.

This said, having all the tags in the pool collated *if it is marked as a comic pool and not just an image pool* and displayed on the pool page would be awesome, and likely wouldn't be that intensive a function.

123easy said:
No go on that nme. That's exactly what TWYS DOES NOT allow. We've had massive arguments over this as a community- We do NOT allow outside information EXCEPT for character names and artists, for obvious reasons.

my only argument is that pages of a comic, are the same piece of artwork.doesn't make sense to me that if all pages are stitched together, it'd be tagged just "shemale" but when split it'd be labeled "female" on one page, and "shemale" on the other

nme22 said:
my only argument is that pages of a comic, are the same piece of artwork.doesn't make sense to me that if all pages are stitched together, it'd be tagged just "shemale" but when split it'd be labeled "female" on one page, and "shemale" on the other

We tag each upload separately.
Not by "piece of artwork".
If you want to "stitch together" comic pages into a single upload, I don't think anything is stopping you.

nme22 said:
my only argument is that pages of a comic, are the same piece of artwork.doesn't make sense to me that if all pages are stitched together, it'd be tagged just "shemale" but when split it'd be labeled "female" on one page, and "shemale" on the other

They are not the same piece of artwork. Each page is a separate piece. Yes, there is the cohesive grouping of the individual pieces into a collection called a multi-page comic, but that is not the same. If you stitched together each page into a single image and uploaded that, assuming the admins didn't delete it because it'd be retardedly long, that would be fine to tag everything in that entire piece together, as such images are considered to both be an individual piece of art itself as well as a collation of the artwork used to make it.

nme22 said:

I don't mean putting a "dick" tag on an image with a lone nude woman that has a naked guy appearing 5 pages later. i mean, if you see a character with breasts, and a skirt, you'd probably tag it "female", but if the next page of that comic reveals that the "female" is actually a "shemale", the first page should be "shemale".

No, as the first page does not show a dickgirl but a female. So when someone searches the tag dickgirl they dont have to deal with images of females. Also when some searches female, they dont miss out on images showing a char that looks female with no sign of being something else on that image. Tag what you see...we dont break that rule. Without it, it would mess up tags and searches.

alright, looks like it's a unanimous "no", so i leave off with one last thing.

Conker said:
No, as the first page does not show a dickgirl but a female.

that's the thing. when clothed a female and a shemale look the same, as do cuntboys and males. if in a single picture i see what the artist calls a "shemale" but i see only a female, then yes, that's the reason for "tag what you see". looks like a female, i'll treat it like a female, BUT hypothetically, if i couldn't stand dick-girls, i'd be pretty mad clicking "next" and finding out it was a shemale i thought was cute. an artist could draw a character as male, and again as female, so one can't assume a pic of Renamon is female when one can't see breasts. Comics to me are different, they are a solid storyline,drawn normally by a single artist.

still, i say there should be either pool-tags, or better black-list blocking.

As many of you have guessed, I meant pools, not sets. Sorry about that!

nme22 said:
alright, looks like it's a unanimous "no", so i leave off with one last thing.
that's the thing. when clothed a female and a shemale look the same, as do cuntboys and males. if in a single picture i see what the artist calls a "shemale" but i see only a female, then yes, that's the reason for "tag what you see". looks like a female, i'll treat it like a female, BUT hypothetically, if i couldn't stand dick-girls, i'd be pretty mad clicking "next" and finding out it was a shemale i thought was cute. an artist could draw a character as male, and again as female, so one can't assume a pic of Renamon is female when one can't see breasts. Comics to me are different, they are a solid storyline,drawn normally by a single artist.

still, i say there should be either pool-tags, or better black-list blocking.

And this is why we're requesting pool tags for images in a set so that that sort of situation can be avoided, but that said, pools as they are currently are view at your own risk. The only person you have any right to be mad at is yourself if you hate seeing other genders that much. :/

nme22 said:
BUT hypothetically, if i couldn't stand dick-girls, i'd be pretty mad clicking "next" and finding out it was a shemale i thought was cute.Comics to me are different, they are a solid storyline,drawn normally by a single artist.

If you have dickgirl blacklisted you wouldnt see it anyway. Also comics are not the point of discussion, we tag what you see by pic to pic, if its not in the image we dont tag it. I think everyone has already made that clear already. Because I know people who look up the tag dickgirl dont wish to see a fully clothed female tagged as dickgirl, that just pisses people off with bad tagging. ...I think Iv'e made my point clear enough.

Conker said:
If you have dickgirl blacklisted you wouldnt see it anyway.

Actually, if he clicks next in a pool, he will see it. Blacklisting just prevents it from being thumbed/displayed in a regular search. If it's blacklisted in a pool you're viewing, it just has the blacklisted thumb replacement, but can still be accessed through clicking the image directly in the pool (not what's going on here) or clicking next until it comes up in the natural progression of the pool (which has no warning).

(Search Help) said:
pool:fox_and_the_grapes
pool:4
Search for posts in the pool Fox and the Grapes. You can also specify a pool ID.

If people are seriously that butthurt about seeing dicks then just search the pool before you browse. If it returns anything then you know you don't want it.
A temporary fix until someone decides pool-wide blacklist is a good idea.

DarkShadow6 said:
If people are seriously that butthurt about seeing dicks then just search the pool before you browse. If it returns anything then you know you don't want it.
A temporary fix until someone decides pool-wide blacklist is a good idea.

well, it's a lot of work. it'd be a very convenient feature, to either block blacklisted stuff (on it's page, not just the thumbnail) or provide some kind of warning (not blocked) if future pages have stuff you don't want, like scat.

EDIT:
to clarify, if page 1 of a comic has a beautiful woman, and page 3 has scat, i don't wanna miss out on page 1 because of scat on 3. i understand that, i suggest a warning or no-page-block, or both

Also, can there be a rule about not posting embeded material? like stuff that relies on an outside server to run. (I.E. youtube vids)

nme22 said:
Also, can there be a rule about not posting embeded material? like stuff that relies on an outside server to run. (I.E. youtube vids)

Why should that be against the rules?

Renard_Queenston said:
Why should that be against the rules?

because, if the source server loses the vid, so do we, If it's just embedded. it's happened with a youtube embed. people should use a video-ripper or something.

nme22 said:
because, if the source server loses the vid, so do we, If it's just embedded. it's happened with a youtube embed. people should use a video-ripper or something.

That isn't actually anything to be concerned about.

CoC has been updated!

Changelog
Update 12.16.13 (Current version)
Expanded category "Posting Abuse"
Migrated CoC to site Wiki
Minor formatting and grammar changes
Expanded "Contact Information"

Peekaboo said:

And regarding memes, how strict is the rule now? Since we have quite a lot of meme stuff on here, and I'd like it to continue to grow, at a slow rate that is.

memes are fine so long as they have some sort of artistic merit, just like always

Peekaboo said:
"Uploading screenshots, images under 200x200 pixels, images with artifacts or large watermarks, and/or non-artistic images (motivational posters, Second Life, memes, image macros, etc.)"

Now, I still don't fully understand this. What's the deal with a lot of screenshots being approved? Especially Skyrim screenshots since the images uploaded are usually just screenshots from some low-quality bondage/sex mod in action.

And regarding memes, how strict is the rule now? Since we have quite a lot of meme stuff on here, and I'd like it to continue to grow, at a slow rate that is.

Admin roulette basically :P

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Uploading screenshots, images under 200x200 pixels, images with artifacts or large watermarks, and/or non-artistic images (motivational posters, Second Life, memes, image macros, etc.)

Wait a sec...wasnt the rule under 300x300? Also, whats wrong with large watermarks if they are done well? (aka see though ect) I know a lot of stupidfox work has watermarks and some stuff uploaded from da but its still good work non the less.

Lastly no memes? Why not?

ippiki_ookami said:
memes are fine so long as they have some sort of artistic merit, just like always

Which is it? The update on the rules says they are not allowed...it seems like this isnt being clear on whats allowed or not allowed...again.

CamKitty said:
Admin roulette basically :P

Seems so...

Update 12.19.13
Expanded category "Abuse of Site Tools"

EDFDarkAngel1 said:
Update 12.19.13
Expanded category "Abuse of Site Tools"

"In addition, if a person who is submitting content wishes it for it to be removed, for any reason, within 48 hours, that request will be honored."

So then if someone posts a picture, then goes, "oh crap, artist wants it taken down, submitting request because they talked to me and my bad!" it'll be treated as a normal takedown request from a copyright holder? If it's how I'm understanding it, that's a good change.