Topic: Tag Implication: throat_swabbing -> fellatio

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Implicating throat_swabbing → fellatio
Link to implication

Reason:

See the description of the wiki.
Remove the implication throat_swabbing --> oral because fellatio implies to oral too.

Also imply
Throat_swabbing --> on_back.
Throat swabbing is performed with one of the participants on the back.

(this is my first try using this format with multiple suggestions, hopefully this is better and the related suggestions don't get lost)

EDIT: The tag implication throat_swabbing -> fellatio (forum #252571) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

Would it still be considered throat_swabbing if the characters were in the same position doing the same general action, except the one on top was a female wearing a strap-on?

That seems like something to consider.

I'm not really familiar with the term, so I'm not sure how much it's referring to a specific action, compared to referring to a position.

Edit:

throatfuck is aliased to deep_throat while throat_fuck is aliased to throat_swabbing. That should be fixed.

Updated by anonymous

Clawdragons said:
Would it still be considered throat_swabbing if the characters were in the same position doing the same general action, except the one on top was a female wearing a strap-on?

That seems like something to consider.

I'm not really familiar with the term, so I'm not sure how much it's referring to a specific action, compared to referring to a position.

Edit:

throatfuck is aliased to deep_throat while throat_fuck is aliased to throat_swabbing. That should be fixed.

I mean, I'd say it is. that's what the male/female male/male/ female/female etc tags are for. :)

Updated by anonymous

Clawdragons said:
Would it still be considered throat_swabbing if the characters were in the same position doing the same general action, except the one on top was a female wearing a strap-on?

That seems like something to consider.

To further that thought, we have strapon_fellatio for that situation.

Should strapon_fellatio also be tagged fellatio (and sex and oral by implication)? I don't know, but probably not. Tag issues seem easier to solve when tags are more inclusive, though, as opposed to making more rules and blocking tags off from each other for ever more arbitrary reasons, and in this case a user can always search fellatio -strapon_fellatio if desired.

Updated by anonymous

Clawdragons said:
throatfuck is aliased to deep_throat while throat_fuck is aliased to throat_swabbing. That should be fixed.

Yeah, wow, that's all fucked up isn't it? I mean does whoever approved those aliases even know what throat fucking is? It's the sex act of thrusting of the penis into the mouth of a partner. Thrusting. It's not the same as deepthroat, because you can deepthroat without thrusting. You see that shit in porn all the time when the woman deepthroats the dude's dick without him moving a muscle.

Of course this can be hard to depict in art, but it's entirely possible and rule34.xxx has a robust section of this under the tag "irrumatio" (basically Japanese for throat fuck). Usually it involves some motion lines or motion blur to indicate the penis is being thrust into the mouth of the partner.

So am I right to assume this site literally has no true tag for throat fucking because it has been aliased away? If so this is probably the absolute worst case of aliasing gone wrong I have ever seen.

Updated by anonymous

watsit said:
It could actually be either, so it should probably be implicated to oral or oral_penetration instead of fellatio.

+1 to this, fellatio implies actively attempting to pleasure someone by the penetrated character, while there's also plenty of examples of irrumatio with this tag.

  • 1