I've currently blacklisted blood because I don't want to see porn of it, but unfortunately that also blacklists non-sexual forms of blood (such as cuts from a sword) and minor uses of blood in a pretty sensible way (virginity taken, starts bleeding a little.)

Then there is the blood fetishization, which if you blacklist blood its probably the reason you blacklisted it. When I mean fetishization, that picture of the dog being fucked by a cheese grater or the post where someone's ridiculous_fit literally destroys the person. That kind of stuff.

I think it would be suitable to have a tag for blood and a tag for fetishization of blood. Discuss!

Or instead be able to bundle blacklist tags together {blood sex}

But then that would prevent people from seeing things that include not a ludicrous amount of blood, once again, the virginity example comes to mind.

And besides, if you disliked foot fetishization and assuming foot_fetish or footjob as tags didn't exist, would you blacklist feet and sex? A lot of pictures have feet and also sex but in most examples feet + sex doesn't equal foot fetish

Queen_Tyr'ahnee said:
Or instead be able to bundle blacklist tags together {blood sex}

You can already do that unless I'm missing what you mean.

- All posts tagged with both blood and sex
blood rape - All posts tagged with both blood and rape
blood -defloration -virgin - All posts tagged blood, unless they are also tagged with virgin or defloration
blood -nosebleed -weapon -cuts - All posts tagged blood, unless they are also tagged with nosebleed, weapon, or cuts

parasprite said:
You can already do that unless I'm missing what you mean.

blood sex

- All posts tagged with both blood and sex
blood rape - All posts tagged with both blood and rape
blood -defloration -virgin - All posts tagged blood, unless they are also tagged with virgin or defloration
blood -nosebleed -weapon -cuts - All posts tagged blood, unless they are also tagged with nosebleed, weapon, or cuts

I suppose that's alright, I didn't know that the tagging system had that kind of depth to it.

Pendraggon said:
I suppose that's alright, I didn't know that the tagging system had that kind of depth to it.

It's not the tagging system that has depth, it's the blacklist system that has it. The tagging system still only searches for the tags as the group you're looking for.

Furrin_Gok said:
It's not the tagging system that has depth, it's the blacklist system that has it. The tagging system still only searches for the tags as the group you're looking for.

actually the searching has quite a bit of depth too if you know what you are doing

Mutisija said:
actually the searching has quite a bit of depth too if you know what you are doing]

That page is actually missing some of the newer stuff too: help:cheatsheet

parasprite said:
That page is actually missing some of the newer stuff too: help:cheatsheet

Are there plans to change over the "(Search Options)" link on /post pages to that wiki?

animperfectpatsy said:
Are there plans to change over the "(Search Options)" link on /post pages to that wiki?

Eventually I hope to move all of them over. I'd like to have a predefined list of redirects in place (e.g., if /help/cheatsheet doesn't exist, go to /wiki/show?title=help:cheetsheet) to help with the transition, I just haven't gotten that far yet.